Kevin MacDonald: The Jews turn on Turkey

Kevin MacDonald: The Jews turn on Turkey

Kevin MacDonald: Well, that didn’t take long. Turkey’s involvement in the flotilla and its support for the Palestinians has now made it an enemy of the Israel Lobby, with all that that entails. All in all, it’s a good example of Jewish power and moral particularism. After long opposing any resolution on Turkey’s genocide of Armenians, Rep. Howard Berman, a major force for Israel in the US Congress, suddenly supports a Congressional resolution, stating, “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.” He and “a host of other members of the House’s unofficial Jewish caucus have signed on as co-sponsors.”

Berman suddenly found his moral bearings, along with the organized Jewish community. The neocons are naturally leading the charge, summarized byJim Lobe who quotes from a report by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs:

“If Turkey finds its best friends to be Iran, Hamas, Syria and Brazil (look for Venezuela in the future) the security of that information (and Western technology in weapons in Turkey’s arsenal) is suspect. The United States should seriously consider suspending military cooperation with Turkey as a prelude to removing it from [NATO],” suggested the group.

[JINSA's] board of advisers includes many prominent champions of the 2003 Iraq invasion, including former Defence Policy Board chairman Richard Perle, former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director James Woolsey, and former U.N. Amb. John Bolton.

What’s interesting here is the proposal to eject Turkey from NATO. It wasn’t long ago that Turkey was being assured that it could become a member of the EU. Turkey’s exclusion from Europe is widely seen as a big factor in its change of foreign policy. Thomas Friedman: “After a decade of telling the Turks that if they wanted E.U. membership they had to reform their laws, economy, minority rights and civilian-military relations — which the Erdogan government systematically did — the E.U. leadership has now said to Turkey: ‘Oh, you mean nobody told you? We’re a Christian club. No Muslims allowed.’ The E.U.’s rejection of Turkey, a hugely bad move, has been a key factor prompting Turkey to move closer to Iran and the Arab world.”

And that’s the good news. The neocons and the organized Jewish community were big supporters of Turkey’s bid to join the EU–which would have meant that 71 million Turks would have the right to move anywhere in Europe. This would mean the end of Europe as having any defining culture or biological coherence — obviously not a concern to Jewish activists like Friedman.

It’s worth remembering that Jewish activist organizations regarded the admission of Turkey to the EU as a way of civilizing Europe and ensuring cultural, religious, and ethnic pluralism — precisely the policy proposals that the Jewish community has advanced in all Western societies, particularly since the end of World War II. In 2002, at the height of the push for Turkey’s admission to the EU, the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC) had this to say in response to former French president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s argument that Muslim Turkey has no place in the European Union:

Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcome…. During the Holocaust, when Europe was slaughtering its Jews, it was Turkish consuls who extended protection to fugitives from Vichy France and other Nazi allies…. Today’s European neo-Nazis and skinheads focus upon Turkish victims while, Mr. President [d'Estaing], you are reported to be considering the Pope’s plea that your Convention emphasize Europe’s Christian heritage. [The Center suggested that Giscard’s new Constitution] underline the pluralism of a multi-faith and multi-ethnic Europe, in which the participation of Moslem Turkey might bolster the continent’s Moslem communities—and, indeed, Turkey itself—against the menaces of extremism, hate and fundamentalism. A European Turkey can only be beneficial for stability in Europe and the Middle East. (See here; the statement has presumably been removed from the SWC website.)

Turkey in the EU was obviously a win-win situation for Jews: The end of Europe as a Christian civilization with an ethnic core combined with a moderating influence on the Muslims that would benefit Israel. I rather doubt that we’ll be seeing this sort of thing anymore. The chances of Turkey being admitted to the EU now are less than zero.

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s argument that Turkey has no place in Europe is just as valid against admitting any Muslims to Europe. Although the rejection of Turkey doesn’t change the present suicidal dynamic in Europe, it will certainly slow down the process compared to what would have happened had Turkey been admitted, perhaps allowing enough time for Europe to waken from its slumbers.


Bookmark and Share

This entry was posted on Friday, June 18th, 2010 at 9:12 AM and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
39 Responses to “Kevin MacDonald: The Jews turn on Turkey”

1.
Someday says:
June 18, 2010 at 9:59 AM

In reality doubt the Euro elites would have dared let Turkey become a full member of the EC; it would be difficult to disguise such a fateful step.

The elites tend to avoid obviously drastic changes for ones which are more easily downplayed.
2.
Chris Moore says:
June 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM

‘After long opposing any resolution on the Turkey’s genocide of Armenians, Rep. Howard Berman, a major force for Israel in the US Congress, suddenly supports a Congressional resolution, stating, “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.’

So why did the Jewish nationalist occupation in Congress, including Berman, turn a blind eye for decades? These Jewish nationalists are so shamelessly and transparently self-serving and opportunistic, its a wonder that they have any friends whatsoever. That so many politicians and Americans dance to their tune with a grin on their faces just goes to show how corrupt and decayed our society has become.

“Those that bless the Jews are blessed by God,” so the saying goes. Like so many other phenomenon revolving around organized Jewry, it appears up is down and black is white in this case, too — meaning its more likely that those that bless the Jews are touched by Satan.

I’m not a superstitious person, but it seems to me America has been under a darkening shadow since Jewry’s ascension to the helm.
3.
Chris Moore says:
June 18, 2010 at 10:37 AM

Additionally, let’s not forget the reports that many of the Young Turks who engineered the Aremenian holocaust were themselves crypto-Jews. In fact, there are a couple of books about the Dönme — Sephardic Jews who converted to Islam but maintained their secret Jewish identity and associations. Here’s a passage from a magazine article that encapsulates the history and the books called The Other Secret Jews from the Jewish magazine Tablet.

“Most important, several Dönme were leading members of the Committee for Union and Progress, the revolutionary party known as the Young Turks, who in 1908 forced the Sultan to grant a constitution. The Dönme, like Jews and Freemasons, sympathized with the CUP’s scientific, reformist program, though Baer emphasizes that the CUP was not a Dönme party—any more than the Russian Bolsheviks, though they included many Jews, were a Jewish party. Even so, some prominent Young Turks were Dönme, including the editor of the Party’s newspaper and the finance minister in the new CUP government.”

Funny how Jewish conspirators love to brag about prominent roles played by Jews who organized as Jews in plots for revolutionary upheaval that end in mass murder, but deny that Judeofascism plays any role whatsoever in their murderous outcomes.

It’s also interesting that these diaspora Jewish revolutionary groups demand constitutions supposedly guaranteeing equal rights for all, but then implement governments that end up securing special rights and privileges for Jewish cliques that go on to carry out mass murder of non-Jews (and Jewry then professes to believe that history has been so rough on the Jewish people simply because they are different.) And in the case of Israel, the Jews refuse to write and implement a constitution at all because the articles of the state already grant special favoritism to Jews, hence a constitution of rights for all citizens would water down Jewish privilege.

Given all these facts, it becomes clear that not only are Gentile supporters of Judeofascism helping to set up Jewish-supremacist societies the world over, but they are also helping to cut the throats of their own progeny by doing so. I guess certain kinds of trash will do anything for money, power and temporal luxuries.

From:
http://www.judeofascism.com/2010/02/for-opportunistic-zionists-recognition.html
4.
Whites Unite says:
June 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM

“nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.”

Now if only he’d admit that nothing justifies Jews turning a blind eye to the reality their role in East European Communist crimes against humanity.
5.
Tanstaafl says:
June 18, 2010 at 2:49 PM

From Brief History of Turkish Jews:

Since 1492, through five centuries, the Ottoman sultans and the modern day Turkish Republic, welcomed the Jews and offered them a safe haven from persecution in the European countries. The Ottoman Empire at its zenith became one the largest empires in World History covering most of Mediterranean basin region extending from North Africa to Eastern Europe. It has been suggested that one of the characteristics that extended the domination of the Ottoman Empire was its allowance of religious freedom for the different nationalities and minorities under its rule. While many European nations expelled, persecuted or tried to convert the Jews under their dominion, the Turkish people of the Ottoman Empire, remained as an outstanding example of tolerance of different nationalities with different religions.

The presentation above sometimes sounds unusual to strangers who may have heard Turkey only in the context of conquests of the Ottoman Empire.

When I first ran into this page several months ago it was entirely positive – “the jews” and Turks, bestest friends forever. Now it begins with a bitter disclaimer, citing the flotilla fiasco and ending like so:

These pages were titled “Turkish-Jewish Friendship Over 500 Years”. Erdogan government has put an end for this friendship. So this title was removed from this site.

The next step is emach she’mo – May His Name Be Erased.
6.
me says:
June 18, 2010 at 2:55 PM

In reality doubt the Euro elites would have dared let Turkey become a full member of the E
But it would have happened anyway because, at the time it would have been ‘good for jews’ now that it no longer is, it will not..

The selfishness and hypocrisy is stunning.. stunning.
7.
Tanstaafl says:
June 18, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Although the rejection of Turkey doesn’t change the present suicidal dynamic in Europe, it will certainly slow down the process

The question has never been put to popular referendum. Like mass immigration and “hate” laws it is imposed from above by people who expect to profit. It is a genocidal dynamic, not suicidal.
8.
me says:
June 18, 2010 at 3:06 PM

the Young Turks who engineered the Aremenian holocaust were themselves crypto-Jews.
and as with multiculti programs here and in bolshivik russia -the curious result: a competing ethnic group is knocked out and easy to control inferiors are brought in.
9.
me says:
June 18, 2010 at 3:24 PM

I’m not a superstitious person, but it seems to me America has been under a darkening shadow since Jewry’s ascension to the helm
there is something deeply disturbing about their particular brand of ‘evil’ – i think its almost ‘archetypal’ ”evil’ – their behavior, actions and appearance resonate with our folk and religious depictions of evil – ie – the troll, the witch, the devil – look at traditional depictions of evil and compare them to prominent askanazi – you can practically use the current jewish elite to illustrate a grims fairy tale book’s evil characters.
10.
Anonymous says:
June 18, 2010 at 3:26 PM

This is not new in relation to the Gaza blockade and Israeli slaughter of the flotilla. The JTA story linked is dated March 2010. According to information from Thomas.LOC.gov for H.Res. 252, Berman signed on as a co-sponsor on March 17, 2009, when the bill was introduced. The only members to sign on as cosponsors recently are Dean Heller of Nevada on June 10 and Michael Michaud of Maine on June 17.
11.
admin says:
June 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM

@Anonymous: Good point. The troubles between Israel and Turkey began some time ago. The famous incident with the Turkish ambassador was a big deal:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/peres-humiliation-of-turkey-envoy-does-not-reflect-israel-s-diplomacy-1.261381
This article in Salon also emphasizes the turnabout on the genocide issue:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/16/israel_lobby_genocide_armenia

What to make of the rush of Jewish leaders — from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington to a city councilman named Jack Weiss in Los Angeles — coming forward in the past few weeks to divulge their role in genocide denial?

“Frankly, [it] was not becoming for Jews, given that we have likewise been victims of genocide,” Weiss wrote in an inelegant piece in the Jewish Journal.

How to account for these sudden confessions? A pang of remorse? A cleansing of the soul? I’m afraid not. These aren’t confessions, at all. Rather, they are reminders of the debt Turkey owes Israel — and they come with teeth bared.

12.
TGD says:
June 18, 2010 at 3:45 PM

I don’t think that the previous generation of Israeli leaders would have discarded Turkey as a friend and ally so readily. This new generation of Zionist leaders and their US lackeys have no qualms at all about denigrating the Turks and gleefully rubbing in the contempt by broadcasting that stupid parody of “We are the World.” Before the flotilla incident, the deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, deeply humiliated the Turkish ambassador to Israel by seating him on a couch much lower than the Ayalon’s chair while he scolded the ambassador about a TV program produced by a private Turkish company. The old inhibitions that once moderated Jewish behavior in the gentile world have gone by the wayside.

Have you seen the movie Midnight Express about conditions inside a Turkish prison? Any European who still feels that Turkey should join the EU should be made to watch it.
13.
HA says:
June 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM

Re: “No Muslims allowed,” it seems Albania is well on the way to EU accession, and then the Mafia enclave known as Kosovo, already in effect an EU protectorate. What isn’t Friedman telling?
14.
Whites Unite says:
June 18, 2010 at 4:59 PM

Lets review some Turkish actions, and some Jewish responses to those actions:

1821 – The Patriarch of Constantinople, the Eastern Orthodox equivalent of the Pope, is murdered by the Turks. A mob of Jews drags his dead body through the streets of Constantinople and dumps it in the Bosporus.

1822 – The Turks almost completely wipe out the Greek population of Chios, killing 20,000 and enslaving 50,000. Jewish slave traders buy Greek slaves at bargain prices.

1876 – Turkish irregular troops massacer up to 60,000 Bulgarians. When the Russian send troops to liberate Bulgaria, Prime Minister Benjamin D’Israeli threatens to go to war against Russia.

1894 – Turks massacer 100,000+ Armenians. Jews and Donme of Thessalonika and Constantinople stay loyal to the Ottoman Empire through it all.

1915 – Turks massacer 1.5 million Armenians. Donme occupy important positions in the government responsible, Constantinople Jews stay loyal to the Ottoman Empire until the very end.

1974 – Turks invade Cyprus, force 180,000 Greek Cypriotes to flee their homes. “Kissinger exerted himself very strongly to protect Ankara from any congressional reprisal for this outright violation of international law, and promiscuous and illegal misuse of US weaponry.” (London Gaurdian, 2/26/01)

2010 – Turks send food and medicine to Gaza. “Erdogan government has put an end for this friendship.”
15.
me says:
June 18, 2010 at 7:44 PM

Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcom
Notice:
a. they don’t mention WHY they were being expelled.. the implication here is it was bad to expel jews because they were jews, no matter what they did.
b. Muslim “turkey” – eg the Ottman Empire, was brutally supressing Christians, enslaving them, forcing women to be sex slaves, stealing children from famlies for the Jannisaries and slave trade.. but THAT doesn’t matter – the ottoman empire was good because they treated jews well.

angry jew if you are reading : this more than anything illustrates mainstream organized jewish community hostility towards the christian west and utter indifference to our well being
16.
Amazed says:
June 18, 2010 at 11:45 PM

We must remember that this sort of tac is not taken on a whim. There will be a strategy behind this move .Probably to remind Turkey that in a coming war in the Middle East , be careful or we will clobber you with the full force of the our American controlled military.The parasite maneuvers the host.
17.
kirk says:
June 19, 2010 at 2:12 AM

“Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcome…. During the Holocaust, when Europe was slaughtering its Jews, it was Turkish consuls who extended protection to fugitives from Vichy France and other Nazi allies… ”

(Not so) Ironically, for the SWC, european history is all about the Jews, who expelled them, who catered them, who helped them, who didn’t help them etc.etc.
18.
THM says:
June 19, 2010 at 6:19 AM

Generally the Western Mainstream Media suppresses news of the vicious oppression of Christians in Islamic countries (but gives endless coverage of any real or imagined slights to Muslims in European ethnic countries).

Here is an exception to that — a Sixty Minutes report about how the Turkish government is treating Patriarch Batholomew and Orthodox Christians):

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6001717n&tag=api
19.
James O'Meara says:
June 19, 2010 at 6:31 AM

Chris Moore says:

“These Jewish nationalists are so shamelessly and transparently self-serving and opportunistic, its a wonder that they have any friends whatsoever. ”

Oy veh, goiische kopf!

“Sincerity” is for stupid Aryan squareheads.

The Judaic Two-Step, as I call it, the positioning of Jews in positions of power ON BOTH SIDES is what allows the Jew to win every time.

Ever notice how the leaders of every “political movement” are Jews?

Sure, the liberals and Democrats. But don’t forget the Republican “Neo-cons.” Even the American Nazi Party [David White, nee Weiss]

And if not Jews, then don’t forget the Jew Within. Dead Jew Worshipping Christian Zionists, for example. And only three Jews on the Supreme Court? Guess again: So-called “Catholic” Scalia worships the Talmud as “the basis of our American law,” and of course Thomas is his hand puppet, so make that 5 Jews; game over.
20.
Junghans says:
June 19, 2010 at 6:42 AM

Europe is not so much ’slumbering’, as it is anaesthetised by the overwhelming liberal/Marxist Jewish victory of 1945. Ditto in spades for the English speaking White world.
21.
Someday says:
June 19, 2010 at 7:59 AM

Turkey in the EU was obviously a win-win situation for Jews: The end of Europe as a Christian civilization with an ethnic core combined with a moderating influence on the Muslims that would benefit Israel.

The democratisation the the EC insisted on loosened the grip of the Kermalists. (All in all rather similar to Algeria where European advice to have elections took no account of the actual level of support Islamist parties would have if allowed to organize.) Europeans’ demand for democratisation made the profound social changes, like the emancipation of women very difficult to achieve and hence was in practice a barrier to Turkey being admitted to the EC.

Israel’s alliance was with the Kermalist generals but the power of the generals has been broken. Paying price for EU follies The author is correct to doubt that the EU leaders were sincere about letting Turkey become a full member in the forseeable future ( as already said I suspect that’s because they don’t dare, not because of any principle of religious or ethnic defence).

Some say the Turkish ’secularist’ elite is heavily larded with the descendants of Jews: The Dönme
22.
omop says:
June 19, 2010 at 8:37 AM

What is the blind spot that keeps “non-jews” from acknowledging and adjusting to the following ideology/rational of all Jews? And which has been articulated over the past 4000 years, as “La Difference”.

“The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews — all of them in all different levels — is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”
23.
TicTac says:
June 19, 2010 at 9:54 AM

Hey guys, did you see the illegal aliens rioting after Lakers win in LA ?

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel#p/u/3/z9lYdmobSrk
24.
TicTac says:
June 19, 2010 at 10:06 AM

Alex makes a few good points.

Imagine if the Tea Party behaved like that.
Or a BNP gathering.

The media would have condemned them as violent thugs.
But because they`re a protected group -a minority, the media says nothing.
25.
me says:
June 19, 2010 at 12:20 PM

for the SWC, european history is all about the Jews, who expelled them, who catered them, who helped them, who didn’t help them etc.
One curious aspect of this – the monarchs they consider ‘good for jews’ were often the most corrupt and hostile to commoners – and the monarchs they considered ‘bad’ for Jews – like Isabel of Spain – were good for commoners, the people and the country and usually anti-corruption…
26.
Chris Moore says:
June 19, 2010 at 1:36 PM

@ me says: June 19, 2010 at 12:20 PM: “One curious aspect of this – the monarchs they consider ‘good for jews’ were often the most corrupt and hostile to commoners – and the monarchs they considered ‘bad’ for Jews – like Isabel of Spain – were good for commoners, the people and the country and usually anti-corruption…”

Hence it follows that today’s organized Jewry in America love the elitist, Statist-Corporatist neocon Right and the limousine liberal Left, and fear and loathe the middle American “rubes.”

This is why Jewish nationalism/elitist Jewry doesn’t fit or belong in America or any other democracy: they hate and fear the People and their traditions and customs, thus they hate the concept of People’s rights, free speech and equal representation. Deep down, they believe if the People take power, the first thing they will do is persecute the Jews (which becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy/cycle manifesting from Jewry’s own attitudes and behavior.)

Thus, the way they have subverted democracy in America is to seize and buy off the elites and their institutions, using the mainstream media to create a false consciousness in the masses that they are still indeed living in a democracy, even as it is closer to a plutocracy/kleptocracy largely run by organized Jewry, ideological Zionists, Judeophile lefties and Judeo-supremacist neocons/Bushcons (my shorthand for all: “the Judeos”) for Jewry’s benefit and the benefit of its corrupt partners.

Today, and throughout history, what’s good for the Judeos is bad for the People, and what’s good for the People is bad for the Judeos.

This is why to my mind it is inevitable that sooner or later, the Judeos will lose. The only question is how much suffering and loss we will have to endure before they taken down and put on trial for treason, or packed off to Israel.
27.
me says:
June 19, 2010 at 2:15 PM

Today, and throughout history, what’s good for the Judeos is bad for the People, and what’s good for the People is bad for the Judeos
Think of a candidate who is ‘good for the people’ – what would they do?
stop immigration
adapt an America first foreign policy
pursue a sound fiscal policy.

All these things are disasters for organized jewery. Thus, they label candidates ‘anti semitic’ despite not overtly doing anything ‘anti jewish’
28.
Matthias says:
June 19, 2010 at 4:51 PM

It seems the lesson of history is “What’s good for Jews, is bad for mostly everybody else”. Hence the inverse is also true. As Gentile fortunes wax, Jewish fortunes wane. Here is a brilliantly concise summary that speaks volumes in few words:

THE JEW IN EUROPE
Even The Coins Were Jewish
We find the first Jews filtering into Europe some time before the Christian era, particularly in the region of Greece. The ancient Greeks spoke of these Asiatic invaders with considerable bitterness. Very quickly they spread throughout the Roman Empire and into Europe proper. The Jewish merchant, artisan, and slave trader appear on the Roman scene with increasing frequency after the second century A.D. and there can be no doubt that their position in the Roman world was one of growing importance even as the Empire drifted to destruction. Under Justinian, says the Jewish Encyclopedia,

“They enjoyed full religious liberty, in return for which they assumed all a citizen’s duty toward the state; minor offices were also open to them. Only the synagogues were exempt from the duty of quartering soldiers. The trade in slaves constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews, and decrees against this traffic were issued in 335, 336, 339, 384, etc.”

[Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 460, vol. 10]

Seneca, in his writings, bitterly assailed the Romans of his day for aping the Jews, and some historians (notably Gibbon in his monumental Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) have ascribed the downfall of Rome to their corrupting influence. Nero’s wife, Poppaea, was a converted Jewess. As Rome reeled into decline and final collapse, and as the Dark Ages descended over Western civilization, we find the Jew taking a strangle-hold over what remained of European commerce. Says Encyclopedia Britannica:

“. . . there was an inevitable tendency for him to specialize in commerce, for which his acumen and ubiquity gave him special qualifications. In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in his hands, in particular the slave trade, and in Carolingian cartularies Jew and merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms.”

[Encyclopedia Britannica, page 57, vol. 13—1947.]

This hold over European commerce finally became so utterly complete that few gentiles engaged in trade at all; it had become almost entirely a Jewish monopoly. In Poland and Hungary, the coins bore Jewish inscriptions …

Throughout the Medieval period, ["Dark Ages," "Medieval Period," and "Middle Ages" are synonymous terms used to describe the period of decline which characterized western civilization between 500-1300 A.D.] which lasted from 500 A.D. to 1300 A.D., the Jew merchant was dominant all over Europe (except Scandinavia, where he was never permitted to enter) and this dominance included control over the eastern trade routes to the Levant. There was to be no relief from this situation until the Jews were evicted from Europe in the century directly preceding the Renaissance.

(…)

Expelled
The Fourth Lateran Council restricted Jewish commercial advantage but it did not end the Jewish problem. Beginning in the latter part of the 13th century, one European country after another expelled its Jewish population as the only final solution to the problem. First to take the step was England which banned them in 1290. Fifteen years later in 1306 the French followed suit. In steady succession the various states of Europe emulated this example with Spain being one of the last to enforce the ban in 1492. The situation in Spain is worth noting. Says Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57, vol. 13 - 1947]:

“… The 14th century was the golden age of their history in Spain. In 1391 the preaching of a priest of Seville, Fernando Martenez, led to the first general massacre of the Jews who were envied for their prosperity and hated because they were the king’s tax collectors.”

Ferdinand and Isabella, after uniting Spain and driving out the Moors turned their attention to the Jewish problem, with the result that they were evicted completely in 1492. In 1498 Portugal evicted its Jewish population also.

(…)

Back to Poland
By 1500 all of Western Europe except northern Italy, parts of Germany, and the Papal possessions around Avignon, had been rid of the Jewish invasion. For a while, at least, Europe was free of the Jews; not until 1650 did they return in any numbers. Says Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57-58, vol. 13 - 1947.]

“The great mass of the Jewish people were thus to be found once more in the East, in the Polish and Turkish empires . . The few communities suffered to remain in western Europe were meanwhile subjected at last to all the restrictions which earlier ages had usually allowed to remain as an ideal; so that in a sense, the Jewish dark ages may be said to begin with the Renaissance.”

THE RENAISSANCE
As the Jew Departed …
The period marked by the evictions—1300 to 1650—also marks the period of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews departed. Starting at first in the trading cities of northern Italy in about 1300, there began a great rebirth of culture and learning which at first was based almost entirely on the writings of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Very quickly this renascent culture spread over Europe and when the age had ended, in about 1650, Europe was by comparison with her former status, enlightened and civilized. Quite obviously all this could not have taken place had it not been for a great upsurge of commercial activity which occurred simultaneously with, and as an adjunct of, the Renaissance. Not until the nations of Europe had wrested commercial control from the ghetto did this rebirth of western civilization occur.

…”Behind Communism”, Frank L. Britton, 1952.

What is most striking at least to me is that European history has a distinct biological component; once her parasites were expelled, the host’s labours became entirely devoted to its own interests and the organism’s health returned.

The Jewish Golden Age was Europe’s Dark Age; the Jewish Dark Age was Europe’s Renaissance. From no less an authority than the Encyclopedia Brittanica.

Let us all work together to usher in our next Renaissance.
29.
GSX-R750 guy says:
June 19, 2010 at 7:58 PM

A metaphor is like a simile.

Sent from my Android phone
30.
Walter Duranty says:
June 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM

Anything which further isolates Israel from the rest of the civilized world is a good thing. Maybe Turkey can read the writing on the wall, with regards to the death throes of Zionism, and doesn’t want to associate itself with a country marked for death and destruction?
31.
James says:
June 20, 2010 at 11:10 AM

Raising the issue of the Armenian genocide,
one of the great crimes of the 20th century,
is very important as it may offer at last the
opportunity to shed light on that terrible
event in history and maybe give mankind an
opportunity to learn such lessons as are
impregnated in the truthful details of that
very sad history.
Luckily, the magnum opus on this historical
horror, the Turkish genocide of the Armenians,
is waiting patiently in the shadows for just such
a movement, at last, toward interest in
frankly delving into just what did happen,
how and why:
The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians
by Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Let the light shine in on this thorn in the side
of human history. Justice is no longer possible
for the Armenian victims; but the delayed light
of justice can benefit us, the living, and illuminate
our future course. Like ripe nuggets left too long
on the tree of knowledge, the truth about the
Armenian genocide is ripe and ready to be picked.
see:
The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians
By Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Enlarged Second Edition
Complete 575 page book is available
free online pdf:
http://www.jewishracism.com/Jewish_Genocide_Enlarged.pdf

from: author Bjerknes’ website: http://www.jewishracism.com