Are German politicians beginning to show backbone toward predatory Jewish financiers?

CSU-Gauweiler beschuldigt die “heimliche jüdische Weltregierung” des globalen Finanz-Hexentanzes, der uns alle vernichtet Gauweiler of the CSU Party blames the secret Jewish world government for the “Witches’ Dance” that is destroying the world economy. In doing so, he entirely confirms the National Journal analysis! http://globalfire.tv/nj/11de/globalismus/parkavenue.htm By the authors of the National Journal Translated by J M Damon [Are German politicians beginning to show backbone toward predatory Jewish financiers?] Until the last minute, Peter Gauweiler attempted to block the tribute payments by Christian Wullf, President of our so-called Federal Parliament (the tribute that had been guaranteed by the abject head-nodders in our less-than-august legislative body.) Wulff had expressed his opposition to tribute payments in his Lindau Speech, but as always he dutifully did what the Lobby commanded, and so our Decline and Fall continues on its inevitable course. Gauweiler will probably be elected acting head of the CSU in Bavaria this fall, and party members are hoping that he can regain the voters’ trust and confidence that the lobby vassal and champion liar Horst Seehofer destroyed as Minister President. This is significant because Gauweiler achieved fame as a critic of the EU and is considered a hero in parts of the “Federal Republic.” In order to regain the confidence of disillusioned voters, Gauweiler states clearly that if matters are left to the likes of Merkel, Schäuble, Steinbrück, Trittin and Seehofer, the Lobby [pro Zionist faction] will soon confiscate everything Germany has. In Gauweiler’s words: “The truth is that we must vigorously resist having our basic rights chiseled away and the same is true of our wealth.” He answers the question of who is taking away Germany’s wealth just as openly. Instead of “finance Jews” however, he uses the expression “Manhattan,” since everyone knows that Wall Street is the world Jewish stronghold: “Today the danger comes from neocollectivist institutions, as ever more wealth is being removed from the control and disposition of the individual. Today, wealth is collectivized, anonymized, mortgaged, hocked and converted to credit guarantees and wagers on the failure of banks, conglomerates and entire states; and then it is sloshed through the stock-markets of the world. The headquarters of the New Collectivism is not in Moscow as in days gone by, but rather Manhattan. But the New Collectivism is as great a threat to property rights as was the Old Collectivism, especially as regards disposition of property.” (Quotation from BILD Magazine, 2 October 2011) We at the National Journal believe that ultimately, Germany’s occupation government will sign over the entirety of German assets to world Jewry as security against the nonredemption of Jewish speculative debts. Jews have officially demanded this often in the past. Thus Henryk Broder demanded “Give Schleswig-Holstein to the Jews” in 2010, while 36-year-old Israeli Ronen Eidelman announced “There should be a Jewish state in Weimar” in 2009. The Rothschilds demanded that Germany be handed over to them even before the Power Jews initiated World War II, and on 22 October 1939 Lionel de Rothschild urged Churchill’s secretary, John Colville, to define England’s war aim as “Divide the Germans among the other nations of the world and leave Germany to the Jews.” (See Downing Street Diaries, 1939-45, Siedler Verlag, Berlin 1988, page 31.) The guarantees for Germany’s gambling debts originate in the Federal Republic’s policy of insuring not only the speculative risks that the European Union countries have racked up with Wall Street, but the risks of the EU banks as well. When banksters, financiers and politicians use the term “Investment” nowadays they are not talking about something such as products with real commercial or industrial value, but rather “Investment” in the sense of a Goldman-Sachs speculation in abstract and unknown commodities. German state banks “invested” specifically in Goldman-Sachs subprime mortgages. While the “German idiots” (Greg Lippman’s favorite expression) were “investing” in Goldman-Sachs speculations, his fellow Jew Lloyd Blankfein (CEO of Goldman Sachs) arranged for his fellow Jew John Paulson (President of Paulson & Co. Hedge Fund) to bet against the German banks. Greg Lippman was the global head of DEUTSCHE BANK mortgage backed securities called collateralized debt obligations or CDOs. He was wagering against the CDO market while Deutsche Bank was selling and promoting CDOs! [See ] The favorite customers of Blankfein and consorts were found in “...that entity, so cherished in world finance markets, that goes under the sobriquet of ‘Stupid German Money,’ namely the German State Banks.” (DIE WELT, 10 September 2011, page 5) While Blankfein was persuading German state banks and government organizations such as KREDITANSTALT FÜR WIEDERAUFBAU and DEUTSCHE INDUSTRIE BANK to back billions in “investments” offered by “third parties,” his accomplice John Paulson was wagering on the collapse of these same “investments.” “Goldman Wagered Against Its Own Customers” is the title of the article on Page 23 of SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG for 28 April 2010. Paulson did in fact have his fellow Jew Blankfein develop the concept for a fifteen million dollar swindle of Blankfein’s customers. Of course Blankfein was happy to deliver the coveted “paper.” This explains how they organized the collapse of the global finance market to win the wagers against the “stupid Germans.” The collapse of Goldman-Sachs “Investments” such as CDOs flushed billions of dollars into the pockets of these banksters, while our so-called “Federal Republic” was the principal backer of the swindle. Furthermore the swindle is still going on today with CDS (credit default swap) wagers against the Euro countries. Even the Establishment SPIEGEL magazine openly admits that such devastation is part of the war that Wall Street is conducting against the German VOLK. The Lehman campaign of plunder, which our “Federal Republic” encouraged with special laws, is in fact considered “collateral damage of a modern war.” (SPIEGEL, November 2009, page 42.) As expected, our “Lobby Democrats” [pro Zionist faction] openly side with the war dogs attacking our people. This fifth column in our government passed the laws that made it possible for gangs of Wall Street freebooters to gain a stunning victory in their all-out war of conquest. Our so-called “Federal Republic” backed the payout of these wagers to Blankfein and the rest of his tribe with its so-called BANKENRETTUNG (Bank Rescue). Today it is backing new wagers in the trillions through its so-called EURO-RETTUNGSSCHIRME (Euro rescue package.) Since banks in the age of Globlism are allowed to wager unlimited trillions in speculative “investment” gambling schemes, the amount of fiat money created out of thin air is increasing at lightning speed. Formerly, banks were allowed to lend only as much money as was already in circulation, but today banks are allowed to guarantee any amount they want to - it can be a million times the Gross Domestic Product! Banks are no longer required to balance their wagers, or even to identify them. Only Wall Street can win such wagers as these, and when banks fail because of their “investing” in outlandish gambling schemes, suddenly the call reverberates through the halls of our government: “Save the Banks! Re-capitalize the Banks!” However, these banks did not become insolvent because of irresponsible borrowing on the part of taxpayers, either employers or employees. They became insolvent because the banks gambled everything in a stupendous shell game. Now a mountain of money is being put into circulation (initially electronically, though “digital dollars”) that is bound to release hyperinflation such as we have never seen. Peter Gauweiler makes this very clear: “According to the International Monetary Fund, the Gross World Product (the value of all goods and services produced in all countries combined) amounted to a little over 60 trillion dollars in 2010. In a single month of the same year, however, the total of financial transactions amounted to over 900 trillion dollars. And yet the already hopelessly indebted EU countries believe (or say they believe) that they can take on still more massive debt by protecting themselves with a little umbrella of 750 billion Euros!” It is significant that Gauweiler confirms the National Journal’s analysis. We have repeatedly pointed out that it is actually quintillions in speculative debt that are being tied like millstones around German necks for a thousand generations to come. Few people wanted to believe it, but now our analysis has been confirmed by no less a person than Peter Gauweiler, the well-known Euro critic and CSU leader. In just one month in 2010, more than 900 trillion dollars in wagers were guaranteed for the benefit of Wall Street. As Gauweiler confirms, our “Federal Republic” is paying for the entire global gambling hysteria. The “Federal Republic” people believe that that can pay off the 12 quintillion dollars in total speculative wagers from the year 2010 with their little “umbrellas!” Gauweiler the CSU man actually went still further than this in his interview. If he had just named the Wall Street gang as the guilty ones, that alone would have been enough to make clear just who wants our blood. But he was more precise and went further than that. He characterized these gigantic predators on mankind as the “boys from Park Avenue” who are bringing about the global calamity: “Sometime soon, the Boys in Park Avenue will be wagering on the end of the world... They keep on irresponsibly producing ever greater torrents of money.” Gauweiler points out that every new “rescue package” is already obsolete and inadequate as soon as the BUNDESTAG passes it, since reckless financial culprits by then have already created “ever more gigantic torrents of money.” Gauweiler does not hesitate to call the culprits by their name: “THE BOYS FROM PARK AVENUE,” more precisely the Pratt House on Park Avenue in New York. Pratt House is the residence of America’s secret world government called CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations. [See “AMERIKAS HEIMLICHE WELTREGIERUNG” (America’s Secret World Government), a film by Wilhelm Bittorf, which was broadcast by ARD Broadcasting Co., Programm 1, 26 November 1975 at 8:15 pm.] Gauweiler had something very specific and significant in mind when he characterized the CFR as the puppet-master of the global calamity. After all, the bosses of this “secret world government” are Jews holding Israeli passports. The CFR Board of Directors reads like a “Who’s Who” of world Jewry. Its president is the hardcore Zionist Richard Haass and its vice-presidents are Richard E. Salomon, Robert E. Rubin and Carla A. Hillls, all equally hardcore. There does not have to be a financial crisis, certainly not an economic crisis. There need be no unemployed, no credit crunch and no poverty. The hireling Lobby politicians in our parliament would simply have to change sides and represent the interests of the German people for a change. They could simply erase the computer-generated trillions in speculative debt, and our nightmare would be over. It would be like switching on the lights in a dark room. However, such courage is not to be expected from such abject vassals. Only the NPD (National Party of Germany) would have the courage to jail the Lobby swindlers and their managers wherever and whenever they can be apprehended. Only by adopting the policies of the NPD can the Lobby hirelings do partial penance for the immense guilt they have heaped on themselves. [NOTE: The Gauweiler quotations are from BILD Magazine for 2 October 2011] **************** This article is available on request in MS Word Format **************** The translator is a Germanophilic Germanist who translates noteworthy articles by German dissidents for his fellow Germanophiles who do not read German. **************** Here's freedom to him who would speak, Here's freedom to him who would write; For there's none ever feared that the truth should be heard, Save him whom the truth would indict! ROBERT BURNS (1759–96)

More shocking news from the Vatican.

More shocking news from the Vatican. Vatican Insider 10/16/2011 Williamson gives his anti-Semitic hatred another go The Lefebvrist Bishop, Richard Williamson, tries again. On the eve of the Interrelligious meeting convened in Assisi by Pope Benedict XVI - where the participation of the chief rabbi of Rome, Riccardo Di Segni, is already in doubt - and while the congregation to which he belongs, the Society of Saint Pius X, discusses whether to accept the conciliation proposal from the Vatican, the traditionalist bishop makes himself heard once again, and takes aim at one of his perennial targets: the Jews. They are guilty of "deicide" and "continue to act collectively as enemies of the true Messiah," he writes in the latest edition of his weekly newsletter, the Eleison Comments. "How can the Pope to abandon these truths that are so ancient?", asks the lefebvrist Bishop. Bishop Williamson – a former British Anglican who converted to Catholicism and was ordained a bishop by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, along with three other brothers in 1988, a schismatic act sanctioned by Pope John Paul II with excommunication - made headlines in January 2009, when the Swedish television SVT aired an interview in which, among other things, he denied the existence of gas chambers and the death of six million Jews during the Holocaust. His words took on global notoriety because in those days Pope Benedict XVI, moved by the desire to heal the schism of Archbishop Lefebvre, had decided to lift the excommunication imposed on four traditionalist bishops, including Bishop Williamson. This created a global diplomatic crisis and a wound in relations with those whom the last two popes have called the "elder brothers" of Christians, that has yet to heal completely. At the origin of Bishop Williamson's new attack is something written by Pope Benedict XVI in his book "Light of the world": that the Jews can not be held responsible for 'deicide', or the death of Jesus on the cross. Words that the Lefebvrist bishop coupled with those of the U.S. Conference of Bishops, whose responsible for ecumenical dialogue, Father James Massa, last May 17 remineded faithful that anone who makes this accusation against the Jews, at any time in history, automatically put himself outside the Catholic Church. For Williamson, first of all, the death of Jesus on the cross was really "deicide", because Jesus was killed, "the second person of God," and therefore, "God was killed." Then, even if Jesus died on the cross to save all humanity, "only the Jews (the people and leaders) were the primary agents of the deicide because it is clear from the Gospels that the Gentile who was most involved, Pontius Pilate, would never have condemned Jesus" if the Jews had not asked for "blood". Finally, according to the Lefebvrist bishop, at least one modern pope, Leo XIII, explicitly affirmed the "solidarity" between the Jews "who clamored for the killing of Jesus" and Jews of today, in the act of consecrating the world to the sacred heart of Jesus, with the Encyclical Annum Sacrum of 1899. But this "continuity", according to Williamson, is shared by the Jews themselves today, who not by chance "claim for themselves the land of Palestine because it is theirs by right from the God of the Old Testament." "Has there ever been a race-people-nation on the face of the earth more proudly self-identifying as identical down the ages?". The Jews would have "collectively" refused to recognize Jesus as messiah and "collectively, which means that there are always some noble exceptions, they have remained faithful to that refusal, so that they changed their religion from that of Abraham and Moses of the Old Testament to that of Annas and Caiaphas and of the Talmud." "How can the Pope let go of such ancient truths?", the lefebvrist Bishop asks in conclusion. Although Williamson's positions are extreme even within the traditionalist world, they are certainly not isolated even within the Lefebvrist community itself. Just a month ago, the superior of the French province of the Society of St. Pius X, abbot Regis de Cacqueray, repeated the charge of 'deicide' against the Jews in a document condemning the next inter-faith meeting in Assisi. "How can one imagine that God is pleased with the prayers of the Jews, who are faithful to their fathers who crucified his son and deny the Trinitarian God?", wrote the Lefebrist superior. http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/homepage/world-news/detail/articolo/9033/

They hate our Freedumm at Demockracy

War for 'freedom of speech' now on Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:27PM GMT Reddit By Patrick Henningsen, Infowars.com In case you are not yet aware, OfCom, Britain's Office of Communications, has decided to take Press TV off air in the UK this week. The significance of this move by the state regulator should not be underestimated. The battle for free speech is definitely on. With this move, the state apparatus has all but declared war on a foreign network's ability to broadcast a political perspective that differs from the consensus reality line. Note that the state, particularly in the UK, will spend millions per year in order to enforce a rolling agenda of talking points. In the US, it will also spend billions to ensure the same thing. Today London's Telegraph newspaper reported, “The foreign arm of the Iranian state broadcaster is to pull off the British airwaves after media regulator revoked its broadcasting license.” Press TV, the channel which acts as the overseas mouthpiece of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government, has been told by Ofcom that it has breached broadcasting rules with interviewing a journalist who has been imprisoned in an Iranian jail and forced to read from a prepared script. The ruling comes after a year-long investigation by Ofcom into the claims made by Maziar Bahari, a journalist for the US magazine, Newsweek, who was filmed by Press TV while being imprisoned in Tehran for nearly four months. He was arrested while covering the 2009 Iranian Presidential elections. With this move, a new front in the info-wars has truly opened up. It's not just about winning over minds and getting the info out. It is now about being able to get that info out there. It's about preserving the free speech platform where we can receive and deliver all that valuable information. And we are up against the state. Over the last eight years, I've involved myself in the battle- the one which Alex Jones and others have referred to as the Information War. The first step was getting informed, and the second step was getting involved by creating content which, up to this point, has relied heavily on the internet's free speech platform. From this open platform, even an individual could broadcast locally, regionally and globally, disseminating information that would otherwise not get to these audiences. Active internet news sounds like this writer, in search of alternative views that differ from the corporate mainstream media conglomerates that could not believe their eyes when Press TV, a 24-hour English language global news network launched online in January 2007, followed by the TV launch later. It seemed to be the only place in the UK where one could go to catch a completely different, fresh take on domestic and world events. For sure, it had an edge. Ofcom's legal reasons for pulling down the network were an administrative one, citing a breach in the broadcasting code and some administrative problems with Press TV's application as the reason. Press TV's response to the UK ban was predictably defiant, “The British media regulator's decision is considered to be an abuse of the UK media law and the result of mounting pressure on the organization by certain members of the royal family and government.” As an alternative international media outlet, Press TV took pains to break the mainstream media's total silence on the violation of international law and human rights committed by the UK government at home and abroad. The fact that the Iranian-owned Press TV has drawn heavy fire from certain establishment and government critics who accuse it of being 'biased' towards an Iranian agenda. If only that were a prerequisite for taking a media network off the air, you could expect that Britain's state broadcaster, the BBC, would have its license revoked overnight in foreign countries around the world. Certainly, the main reason for the West's aggressive attitude toward Press TV is that, according to the US State Department, Iran is meant to be an enemy of the United States, Europe and Israel. If you've been paying attention, the war drum against Iran has not stopped beating since Dick Cheney and John Bolton began pounding it early in 2004. If a war with Iran is on the cards, eliminating Press TV in the UK and the US will be a top priority for the governments in those countries, as Press TV will be broadcasting a different view than the BBC or CNN. This would be very problematic for the establishment. The US and Britain, who built their empires on the powerful illusion of media, simply cannot accept that a country like Iran could win-over English speaking audiences, doing a better job reporting the news than the likes of CNN or the BBC. Worse yet, they cannot accept anything other than an anti-Iranian perspective portrayed through the TV lens. Chris Bambery, a political analyst in London explained the possible motivation behind Britain's move, saying, “To me Press TV has a much wider range of debate than it is available on BBC, with views of people who support their Republican Party in the United States, who support free market policies in this country. I have debated with those people and I think Press TV has done an startling job here and that is precisely why, I believe, it is being taken off because as the reporter just said, we know there has been pressure from a number of lobbies in this country, from the Foreign Office and inside the BBC to take Press TV off the air.” Will the state be moving in on another foreign network next? Following the strength of Press TV, in August 2007 Russia Today (RT), another 24 hr global news network that offered an incredibly diverse band of news and opinion, not seen before on TV, arrived. Before long, RT became the second most-watched foreign news channel in the United States, after the BBC, and also set a TV News Channel record after exceeding a view count on YouTube of half a billion. Like Press TV, the staff at RT remained committed to delivering an even more challenging slate of programming, with it's strap-line, “RT: question more.” It has kept its overwhelmingly anti-war, anti-globalist and pro-humanity agenda, and is generally resistant to the usual propaganda lines which are streamlined through the Murdoch media press, routinely churned out of the Whitehall, Tel Aviv, White House and US State Department. I found myself becoming RT's number one fan, so I did not hesitate when I was invited to contribute on air. I didn't know anyone in the organization, had no contacts and no introductions. They simply liked my writing and were willing to give me a shot on live TV. To date, no editor at RT has ever censored or attempted to censor anything I have said, or even ask me to alter my opinion on any subject. This type of network practice is very, very rare in today's corporate media matrix and for this reason, interested audiences around the world need to be vigilant and support free speech when it comes under attack from the host state. The Britain's unofficial censorship unit Ofcom has obviously recognized the ability of countries like Iran to produce slick, polished and balanced programming- and deliver it with a high degree of professionalism. And in TV, the rating doesn't lie. The establishment knows full well that both Press TV and RT have attracted millions of viewers- viewers who will never go back to the BBC News, SKY News or ITV News. The battle begins. Today it is a 'foreign' TV network like Press TV that is being targeted, and taken down by the state. Tomorrow, it could be RT… and after that, who knows? Will it be hundreds of 'foreign' internet news websites like Infowars.com. This latest victory for the censors is a move backwards for Britain, and it strikes deep into the heart of our free society- a society that generations have fought long and hard to arrive at. Support Press TV, support RT. If you really live in a free society, you should be able to watch and support any network that you choose to. Have no doubt, the infowar is well and truly on. -- Author Patrick Henningsen is an Associate Editor for Infowars, Editor of 21st Century Wire . PH/PKH