Crooked accounting firm PWC caught doing an Arthur Anderson with market manipulators
J P Morgan
PwC faces inquiry over JP Morgan
PwC faces inquiry over JP Morgan
Sunday 6th June 2010
Price Waterhouse Coopers, the world-renowned auditors, looks set to be referred to accountancy regulators after the FSA issued a £33.3 million fine against J.P. Morgan for mixing company money with client money. The FSA is set to refer PwC for the very fact that the company has been auditing the accounts of J.P. Morgan over the seven-year period during which the company admits mixing client money with company money.
When you consider that as much as £16 billion was held in incorrect bank accounts, giving no legal protection to client funds, this is the situation which has alarmed the FSA. It is unclear exactly how the situation arose as all financial institutions are well aware of the need to separate client money from company money, as are the many auditors and accountants also involved in the industry.
It is also unclear what action, if any, the regulator will take against Price Waterhouse Coopers but it does serve as a warning to those in the financial industry. The regulators are becoming ever more vigilant in their task of protecting client money and ensuring that the best advice is given to clients at all times. There is no doubt that the FSA has become more proactive on a number of fronts over the last few years and due to actions taken by the Authority, UK consumers now have more protection than ever before.
»» Return to Homepage
»» Full Investments News Archive
»» Invest with Fidelity
Wednesday, 16 June 2010
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
Explosive new information has broken with regard to destruction of pre-9-11 options trading records.
It must have been those evil MUSLIMS who assumed a massive short position, and bought millions of dollars of put options in key stocks just before the attack on 911..... Yeah, they did it....
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/06/destruction-of-9-11-options-trading.html
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
CONFIRMED: Destruction of 9-11 Options Trading Documents
Explosive new information has broken with regard to destruction of pre-9-11 options trading records.
Just prior to 9-11, someone (or group of people) bought large amounts of put options on various airline stocks. Put options gain in value when a stock goes down. The airline stocks went down after 9-11.
According to CBS (ViaZeroHedge)
At least one Wall Street firm reported their suspicions about this activity to the SEC shortly after the attack.
I have been reporting for sometime (See my July 2006 mention) on the destruction of pre-9-11 options documents by the CBOE. Now, it appears the SEC also destroyed similar documents.
David Callahan - executive editor of SmartCEO - submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the SEC regarding the pre-9/11 put options.
Here's how the SEC replied:
This letter is in response to your request seeking access to and copies of the documentary evidence referred to in footnote 130 of Chapter 5 of the September 11 (9/11) Commission Report...We have been advised that the potentially responsive records have been destroyed.
My source is an employee at the CBOE, who told me that, just days after the 9-11 attack , government officials (or at least individuals purporting to be from the government) met with the president of the CBOE and told him to stop the investigation into who purchased the options. The records were destroyed, according to my source.
Now, we have confirming evidence from the SEC, itself, of destruction of these type documents that they may have had in their possession. It is extremely heavy circumstantial evidence that the persons who bought these put options knew in advance of the 9-11 attack.
If ever a Congressional inquiry was required, this certainly appears to be a case.
The then CBOE chairman and CEO William Brodsky, the then Vice-Chairman Mark Duffy and the then President and COO Edward Joyce need to be hauled before Congress and asked if an investigation of the put option trading was conducted. If not, why not? (It would appear to be fairly standard to conduct such an investigation given the unusual trading volume in the options) And, if an investigation was conducted, where are the results?
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/06/destruction-of-9-11-options-trading.html
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
CONFIRMED: Destruction of 9-11 Options Trading Documents
Explosive new information has broken with regard to destruction of pre-9-11 options trading records.
Just prior to 9-11, someone (or group of people) bought large amounts of put options on various airline stocks. Put options gain in value when a stock goes down. The airline stocks went down after 9-11.
According to CBS (ViaZeroHedge)
At least one Wall Street firm reported their suspicions about this activity to the SEC shortly after the attack.
I have been reporting for sometime (See my July 2006 mention) on the destruction of pre-9-11 options documents by the CBOE. Now, it appears the SEC also destroyed similar documents.
David Callahan - executive editor of SmartCEO - submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the SEC regarding the pre-9/11 put options.
Here's how the SEC replied:
This letter is in response to your request seeking access to and copies of the documentary evidence referred to in footnote 130 of Chapter 5 of the September 11 (9/11) Commission Report...We have been advised that the potentially responsive records have been destroyed.
My source is an employee at the CBOE, who told me that, just days after the 9-11 attack , government officials (or at least individuals purporting to be from the government) met with the president of the CBOE and told him to stop the investigation into who purchased the options. The records were destroyed, according to my source.
Now, we have confirming evidence from the SEC, itself, of destruction of these type documents that they may have had in their possession. It is extremely heavy circumstantial evidence that the persons who bought these put options knew in advance of the 9-11 attack.
If ever a Congressional inquiry was required, this certainly appears to be a case.
The then CBOE chairman and CEO William Brodsky, the then Vice-Chairman Mark Duffy and the then President and COO Edward Joyce need to be hauled before Congress and asked if an investigation of the put option trading was conducted. If not, why not? (It would appear to be fairly standard to conduct such an investigation given the unusual trading volume in the options) And, if an investigation was conducted, where are the results?
Our MPs tell us that education standards have not been dumbed down. Perhaps they should try this 1895 exam set children aged about 13
Our MPs tell us that education standards have not been dumbed down. Perhaps they should try this 1895 exam set children aged about 13
Malcolm Bouchier
One for all the teachers!
1895 EIGHT GRADE FINAL EXAM ... YOU GOTTA SEE THIS !!!
What it took to get an 8th grade education in 1895...
Remember when grandparents and great-grandparents stated that they only had an 8th grade education?
Well, check this out. Could any of us have passed the 8th grade in 1895?
This is the eighth-grade final exam from 1895 in Salina , Kansas , USA ..
It was taken from the original document on file at the Smokey Valley Genealogical Society and Library in Salina ,
and reprinted by the Salina Journal..
8th Grade Final Exam:
Salina , KS - 1895
Grammar (Time, one hour)
1. Give nine rules for the use of capital letters.
2. Name the parts of speech and define those that have no modifications
3. Define verse, stanza and paragraph..
4. What are the principal parts of a verb? Give principal parts of 'lie,' 'play,' and 'run'.
5. Define case; illustrate each case.
6 What is punctuation? Give rules for principal marks of punctuation.
7 - 10. Write a composition of about 150 words and show therein that you understand the practical use of the rules of grammar.
Arithmetic (Time,1 hour 15 minutes)
1. Name and define the Fundamental Rules of Arithmetic.
2. A wagon box is 2 ft. Deep, 10 feet Long, and 3 ft. Wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold?
3. If a load of wheat weighs 3,942 lbs, what is it worth at 50cts/bushel, deducting 1,050 lbs for tare?
4. District No 33 has a valuation of $35,000. What is the necessary levy to carry on a school seven months at $50 per month, and have $104 for incidentals?
5. Find the cost of 6,720 lbs. Coal at $6.00 per ton.
6. Find the interest of $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7percent per annum.
7. What is the cost of 40 boards 12 inches wide and 16 ft long at $20 per metre?
8... Find bank discount on $300 for 90 days (no grace) at 10 percent.
9. What is the cost of a square farm at $15 per acre, the distance of which is 640 rods?
10. Write a Bank Check, a Promissory Note, and a Receipt.
U.S. History (Time, 45 minutes)
1. Give the epochs into which U.S. History is divided
2. Give an account of the discovery of America by Columbus ..
3. Relate the causes and results of the Revolutionary War.
4. Show the territorial growth of the United States ..
5. Tell what you can of the history of Kansas ..
6. Describe three of the most prominent battles of the Rebellion.
7. Who were the following: Morse, Whitney, Fulton , Bell , Lincoln , Penn, and Howe?
8. Name events connected with the following dates: 1607, 1620, 1800, 1849, 1865.
Orthography (Time, one hour)
[Do we even know what this is??]
1. What is meant by the following: alphabet, phonetic, orthography, etymology, syllabication?
2. What are elementary sounds? How classified?
3. What are the following, and give examples of each: trigraph, subvocals, diphthong, cognate letters, linguals?
4. Give four substitutes for caret 'u'.
5. Give two rules for spelling words with final 'e.' Name two exceptions under each rule.
6. Give two uses of silent letters in spelling. Illustrate each.
7. Define the following prefixes and use in connection with a word: bi, dis, pre, semi, post, non, inter, mono, sup.
8. Mark diacritically and divide into syllables the following, and name the sign that indicates the sound: card, ball, mercy, sir, odd, cell, rise, blood, fare, last.
9.. Use the following correctly in sentences: cite, site, sight, fane, fain, feign, vane , vain, vein, raze, raise, rays.
10. Write 10 words frequently mispronounced and indicate pronunciation by use of diacritical marks and by syllabication.
Geography (Time, one hour)
1 What is climate? Upon what does climate depend?
2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas ?
3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean?
4. Describe the mountains of North America ..
5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia , Odessa , Denver , Manitoba , Hecla , Yukon , St. Helena, Juan Fernandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco ..
6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S. Name all the republics of Europe and give the capital of each.
8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude?
9.. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers.
10. Describe the movements of the earth. Give the inclination of the earth.
Malcolm Bouchier
One for all the teachers!
1895 EIGHT GRADE FINAL EXAM ... YOU GOTTA SEE THIS !!!
What it took to get an 8th grade education in 1895...
Remember when grandparents and great-grandparents stated that they only had an 8th grade education?
Well, check this out. Could any of us have passed the 8th grade in 1895?
This is the eighth-grade final exam from 1895 in Salina , Kansas , USA ..
It was taken from the original document on file at the Smokey Valley Genealogical Society and Library in Salina ,
and reprinted by the Salina Journal..
8th Grade Final Exam:
Salina , KS - 1895
Grammar (Time, one hour)
1. Give nine rules for the use of capital letters.
2. Name the parts of speech and define those that have no modifications
3. Define verse, stanza and paragraph..
4. What are the principal parts of a verb? Give principal parts of 'lie,' 'play,' and 'run'.
5. Define case; illustrate each case.
6 What is punctuation? Give rules for principal marks of punctuation.
7 - 10. Write a composition of about 150 words and show therein that you understand the practical use of the rules of grammar.
Arithmetic (Time,1 hour 15 minutes)
1. Name and define the Fundamental Rules of Arithmetic.
2. A wagon box is 2 ft. Deep, 10 feet Long, and 3 ft. Wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold?
3. If a load of wheat weighs 3,942 lbs, what is it worth at 50cts/bushel, deducting 1,050 lbs for tare?
4. District No 33 has a valuation of $35,000. What is the necessary levy to carry on a school seven months at $50 per month, and have $104 for incidentals?
5. Find the cost of 6,720 lbs. Coal at $6.00 per ton.
6. Find the interest of $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7percent per annum.
7. What is the cost of 40 boards 12 inches wide and 16 ft long at $20 per metre?
8... Find bank discount on $300 for 90 days (no grace) at 10 percent.
9. What is the cost of a square farm at $15 per acre, the distance of which is 640 rods?
10. Write a Bank Check, a Promissory Note, and a Receipt.
U.S. History (Time, 45 minutes)
1. Give the epochs into which U.S. History is divided
2. Give an account of the discovery of America by Columbus ..
3. Relate the causes and results of the Revolutionary War.
4. Show the territorial growth of the United States ..
5. Tell what you can of the history of Kansas ..
6. Describe three of the most prominent battles of the Rebellion.
7. Who were the following: Morse, Whitney, Fulton , Bell , Lincoln , Penn, and Howe?
8. Name events connected with the following dates: 1607, 1620, 1800, 1849, 1865.
Orthography (Time, one hour)
[Do we even know what this is??]
1. What is meant by the following: alphabet, phonetic, orthography, etymology, syllabication?
2. What are elementary sounds? How classified?
3. What are the following, and give examples of each: trigraph, subvocals, diphthong, cognate letters, linguals?
4. Give four substitutes for caret 'u'.
5. Give two rules for spelling words with final 'e.' Name two exceptions under each rule.
6. Give two uses of silent letters in spelling. Illustrate each.
7. Define the following prefixes and use in connection with a word: bi, dis, pre, semi, post, non, inter, mono, sup.
8. Mark diacritically and divide into syllables the following, and name the sign that indicates the sound: card, ball, mercy, sir, odd, cell, rise, blood, fare, last.
9.. Use the following correctly in sentences: cite, site, sight, fane, fain, feign, vane , vain, vein, raze, raise, rays.
10. Write 10 words frequently mispronounced and indicate pronunciation by use of diacritical marks and by syllabication.
Geography (Time, one hour)
1 What is climate? Upon what does climate depend?
2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas ?
3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean?
4. Describe the mountains of North America ..
5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia , Odessa , Denver , Manitoba , Hecla , Yukon , St. Helena, Juan Fernandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco ..
6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S. Name all the republics of Europe and give the capital of each.
8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude?
9.. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers.
10. Describe the movements of the earth. Give the inclination of the earth.
"In conclusion, the reality is that the Jews are nomads with an insect-like mentality.
Here's a provocative year 2000 essay by Jana Janus, exploring that very
topic via a few telling paragraphs by H. G. Wells. PDF version with nifty
new montage cover attached as well. Jana (RogueButterfly) does not appear to
be posting anymore. Back when I read this it was the most powerful piece of
writing I'd ever encountered.
[Let me interject some headlines at this point]
They have taken our Divine Inheritance, corrupted it and sold it back to us
for a profit.
- Jana Janus, Nomads of the Diaspora
Other quotes:
The big secret they try to hide
"An examination of the bones in those areas have revealed signs of pot
polishing and cut marks, both indicative of the presence and practice of
cannibalism. The nomads have a voracious appetite for unblemished Human
flesh. Their "lord" demands this. Their priests must supply this. They are
dangerous predators who dine their way through entire civilizations."
The hive is the horror of the herd
"The nomads themselves are not herd animals, they are hive animals,
completely lacking in individuality and spontaneity. They share one mind
between them, insect-like, and all their characteristics, habits and modes
of behavior are ritualized. A herd, on the other hand, is made up of
individuals, each capable of independent action, unless frightened into a
stampede. I have watched herds of cattle. They eat, they rest, they
socialize, they wander, they tend their young, they also come when the bull
calls them but they do not do all these things in unison. Herd animals do
not sit out the Sabbath."
What it is they're doing
"In conclusion, the reality is that the Jews are nomads with an insect-like
mentality. They do not hold any "rights" whatsoever to a "homeland" in the
Middle East or anywhere else for that matter. They are incredibly dangerous
and parasitical and must not be allowed to rule or practice their so-called
"religion". It is devil worship and conjures up untold misery on Humanity."
- - - begin quoted material - - -
TSR NOMADS OF THE DIASPORA
Posted By: RogueButterfly
Date: Thursday, 26-Oct-2000 12:25:59
The Slazon Report #102400
Nomads of the Diaspora
The "Holy Bible" is full of holes. The "Old Testament" is history rewritten
to glorify nomads, the most inferior people ever to roam the Earth. The only
things "new" about the New Testament are the ever new and fresh words and
actions attributed to those whom we have come to know, and love, as Jesus
and John the Baptist. I assure you, by their words and by their actions we
shall know Them. They were not, nor could they ever have been, nomads (aka
Jews).
The Old Testament is history rewritten by nomadic plagiarists in their
attempt to create a record to support their ridiculously outlandish claims
to titles such as: "The Chosen Ones" and land in the Middle East. The Old
Testament is filled with falsified historical records of basically real
events written to cast the "tribes of scribes"
themselves in the roles of heroes or victims, whichever suited their purpose
at the time. The only way they could accomplish this was to destroy, distort
or conceal all physical evidence of real history and attempt to prevent
Humanity from ever accessing the indelible "Akashic Record" which is the
authentic record of every action of every life on Earth. The nomadic fools
still think they can hide their activities by doing their evil deeds in
underground chambers. They are 'way wrong.
The Earth itself is a gigantic recording device and broadcasts through
spinning.
The following excerpt could well be called "Exhibit A" in building the
criminal case against the nomadic predators. It is taken from "The Outline
of History" by H.G. Wells. When reading it keep in mind that "nomads" are,
in fact, the Jews of the Diaspora, the first followers of the depraved
"lord[s]" of the Old Testament.
"Civilization is something more than the occasional seasonal growing of
wheat. It is the settlement of men upon an area continuously cultivated and
possessed, who live in buildings continuously inhabited with a common rule
and a common city or citadel. For a long time civilization may quite
possibly have developed in Mesopotamia without any relations with the
parallel beginnings in Egypt. The two settlements may have been quite
independent, arising separately out of the widely diffused Heliolithic
Neolithic culture. Or they may have had a common origin in the region of the
Mediterranean, the Red Sea, and southern Arabia.
"The first condition necessary to a real settling down of Neolithic men, as
distinguished from a mere temporary settlement among abundant food, was of
course a trustworthy all-the-year-round supply of water, fodder for the
animals, food for themselves, and building material for their homes. There
had to be everything they could need at any season, and no want that would
tempt them to wander further. [Sounds like a description of Paradise.--JJ]
This was a possible state of affairs, no doubt, in many European and Asiatic
valleys; and in many such valleys, as in the case of the Swiss lake
dwellings, men settled from a very early date indeed; but nowhere, of any
countries now known to us, were these favourable conditions found upon such
a scale, and nowhere did they hold good so surely year in and year out as in
Egypt and in the country between the upper waters of the Euphrates and
Tigris and the Persian Gulf. Here was a constant water supply under enduring
sunlight; trustworthy harvests year by year; in Mesopotamia wheat yielded,
says Herodotus, two hundredfold to the sower; Pliny says that it was cut
twice and afterwards yielded good fodder for sheep; there were abundant
palms and many sorts of fruits, and as for building material, in Egypt there
was clay and easily worked stone, and in Mesopotamia a clay that becomes a
brick in the sunshine. In such countries men would cease to wander and
settle down almost unawares; they would multiply and discover themselves
numerous and by their their numbers safe from any casual assailant. They
multiplied producing a denser human population than the earth had ever known
before; their houses became more substantial, wild beasts were exterminated
over great areas, the security of life increased so that ordinary men went
about in the towns and fields without without encumbering themselves with
weapons, and among themselves, at least, they became peaceful peoples. men
took root as man had never taken root before.
"But the fertile and more seasonal lands outside these favoured areas, in
the forests of Europe, the Arabian deserts, and the seasonal pastures of
Central Asia, there developed on the other hand a thinner, more active
population of peoples, the primitive nomadic peoples. In contrast with the
settled fold, the agriculturists, these nomads lived freely and dangerously.
They were in comparison lean and hungry men.
Their herding was still blended with hunting; they fought constantly for
their pastures against hostile families. The discoveries in the elaboration
of implements and the use of metals made by the settled peoples spread to
them and improved their weapons. They followed the settled folk from
Neolithic phase to Bronze phase. It is possible that in the case of iron,
the first users were nomadic. They become more warlike with better arms, and
more capable of rapid movements with the improvement of their transport. One
must not think of a nomadic stage as a predecessor of a settled stage in
human affairs. To begin with, man was a slow drifter, following food. Then
one sort of men began to settle down, and another sort became more
distinctly nomadic. The settled sort began to rely more and more upon grain
for food; the nomad began to make a greater use of milk for food. he bred
his cows for milk. The two ways of life specialized in opposite directions.
It was inevitable that nomad folk and the settled folk should clash, that
the nomads should seem hard barbarians to the settled peoples, and the
settled peoples soft and effeminate and very good plunder to the nomad
peoples. Along the fringes of the developing civilizations there must have
been a constant raiding and bickering between hardy nomadic tribes and
mountain tribes and the more numerous and less warlike peoples in the towns
and villages.
"For the most part this was a mere raiding of the borders. The settled folk
had the weight of numbers on their side; the herdsmen might raid and loot,
but they could not stay. That sort of mutual friction might go on for many
generations. But ever and again we find some leader or some tribe amidst the
disorder of free and independent nomads, powerful enough to force a sort of
unity upon its kindred tribes, and then woe betide the nearest civilization.
Down pour the united nomads on the unwarlike, unarmed plains, and there
ensues a war of conquest.
Instead of carrying off the booty, the conquerors settle down on the
conquered land, which becomes all booty for them; the villagers and townsmen
are reduced to servitude and tribute-paying, they become hewers of wood and
drawers of water, and the leaders of the nomads become kings and princes,
masters and aristocrats. They, too, settle down, they learn many of the arts
and refinements of the conquered, they cease to be lean and hungry, but for
may generations they retain traces of their old nomadic habits, they hunt
and indulge in open-air sports, they drive and race chariots, they regard
work, especially agricultural work, as the lot of an inferior race and
class.
"This in a thousand variations has been one of the main stories in history
for the last seventy centuries or more. In the first history that we can
clearly decipher we find already in all the civilized regions a distinction
between a non-working ruler class and the working mass of the population.
And we find, too, that after some generations, the aristocrat, having
settled down, begins to respect the arts and refinements and lawabidiness of
settlement, and to lose something of his original hardihood. he
intermarries, he patches up a sort of toleration between conqueror and
conquered; he exchanges religious ideas and learns the lessons upon which
soil and climate insist. He becomes a part of the civilization he has
captured. And as he does so, events gather towards a fresh invasion by the
free adventurers of the outer world." (pp. 131-135) --H.G. Wells "The
Outline of History" (Garden City Publishing Co., Inc. 1930)
The nomads have done this to all peaceful and civilized nations.
Please understand what we have lost because of them. You have only to look
around at the world today, with your eyes open, and your thoughts free to
see it. The nomads are responsible for every evil act ever committed in the
world from the beginning right up to this minute.
They have done to others what they do not want done to them. They have
stolen every single God-Given Gift and used it to do evil. They have taken
our Divine Inheritance, corrupted it and sold it back to us for a profit.
They did this in Egypt during Joseph's time and continue to do it today.
They have been difficult to trace historically because, once they invade a
civilization and conqueror it, they assume the identity of those they have
conquered. This has puzzled many anthropologists, archeologists and ancient
historians. Throughout the ancient world they have found archeological
evidence that a completely separate group of people suddenly appears to
reside side by side in the dwellings of the original inhabitants. After an
unspecified period of time the original inhabitants vanish without a trace
except for their bones. An examination of the bones in those areas have
revealed signs of pot polishing and cut marks, both indicative of the
presence and practice of cannibalism. The nomads have a voracious appetite
for unblemished Human flesh. Their "lord" demands this. Their priests must
supply this. They are dangerous predators who dine their way through entire
civilizations. The English language fails when it comes to describing the
extent of their cruelty. It is necessary to call on mathematics and the
"Power of Tens". Cruelty to the 10th power. Theft to the 100th power.
Viciousness to the 1000th power. Evil to the 1,000,000th power.
Long ago they entered Paradise and raped and tortured and looted it.
They decided that they liked it there so they stayed, taking on the identity
and the history of the Paradisical population. A few of their victims
managed to escape. The nomads didn't worry much about them.
They figured they would find them when the time came. After all, they were
hunters, and hunters hunt. Eventually, after laying waste to Paradise and
assuming the characteristics of those whom they had so wantonly devoured,
the greedy and gluttonous nomads moved on. Since their Human herds had
become dangerously depleted, it was time to hunt again, only now they were
armed with the stolen idea of being "special" and "created by God".
The nomads themselves are not herd animals, they are hive animals,
completely lacking in individuality and spontaneity. They share one mind
between them, insect-like, and all their characteristics, habits and modes
of behavior are ritualized. A herd, on the other hand, is made up of
individuals, each capable of independent action, unless frightened into a
stampede. I have watched herds of cattle. They eat, they rest, they
socialize, they wander, they tend their young, they also come when the bull
calls them but they do not do all these things in unison. Herd animals do
not sit out the Sabbath.
Once, on a camping trip, I witnessed a young heifer who refused to come when
the bull called her. She was too interested in my campsite.
The bull came closer and called her firmly. She was torn. I could see this.
She looked at me. She looked longingly at my tent and things and hesitated.
The bull snorted and called her even louder. Reluctantly she obeyed and
started walking slowly towards him glancing back at the tent and me. When
the bull was satisfied that she was coming he turned and headed up the hill,
confident it seemed, that she would follow.
She did, but slowly. When she was gone I realized that I loved her! I stood
there utterly amazed by the depth of feeling I had for her. I missed her
fiercely within minutes of her leaving. I actually felt the urge to follow
her and I had a brief vision of joining her and the herd myself. I wondered
if the bull would accept me. That incident had a profound effect on me. It
was the first time I realized that I did not know WHAT a cow REALLY was.
From that I realized that I did not know what anything REALLY was. I had
been living in a world of labels, without questioning them. It began to dawn
on me that no one really knew anything about anything. We were living in a
gigantic mystery and yet some of the most evil, shallow people have had the
audacity to place themselves as obstacles in the path of knowledge. Such are
the ways of the nomads.
Matthew 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye
shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in
[yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
In conclusion, the reality is that the Jews are nomads with an insect-like
mentality. They do not hold any "rights" whatsoever to a "homeland" in the
Middle East or anywhere else for that matter. They are incredibly dangerous
and parasitical and must not be allowed to rule or practice their so-called
"religion". It is devil worship and conjurers up untold misery on Humanity.
We must bell them as we would bell a cat in order to protect those we love.
Identifying them and exposing them for what they are is also a kindness to
them, preventing them from committing further crimes against Humanity. Their
guilt is enormous. They have proven themselves incapable of resisting the
influence of evil. Compassion dictates that we must help them since most of
them have been taken in their infancy. We must consider them "possessed".
"[This] in a thousand variations has been one of the main stories in history
for the last seventy centuries or more."
--Ibid.
Yes, I know them oh so well. They cannot hide who and what they are from me.
I am The Witness to all their dirty deeds from The Alpha to The Omega. It's
Omega time now.
Jana Janus
Omnipresent on The Mean Planet
--
-- Tsun
"Don't tread on me."
topic via a few telling paragraphs by H. G. Wells. PDF version with nifty
new montage cover attached as well. Jana (RogueButterfly) does not appear to
be posting anymore. Back when I read this it was the most powerful piece of
writing I'd ever encountered.
[Let me interject some headlines at this point]
They have taken our Divine Inheritance, corrupted it and sold it back to us
for a profit.
- Jana Janus, Nomads of the Diaspora
Other quotes:
The big secret they try to hide
"An examination of the bones in those areas have revealed signs of pot
polishing and cut marks, both indicative of the presence and practice of
cannibalism. The nomads have a voracious appetite for unblemished Human
flesh. Their "lord" demands this. Their priests must supply this. They are
dangerous predators who dine their way through entire civilizations."
The hive is the horror of the herd
"The nomads themselves are not herd animals, they are hive animals,
completely lacking in individuality and spontaneity. They share one mind
between them, insect-like, and all their characteristics, habits and modes
of behavior are ritualized. A herd, on the other hand, is made up of
individuals, each capable of independent action, unless frightened into a
stampede. I have watched herds of cattle. They eat, they rest, they
socialize, they wander, they tend their young, they also come when the bull
calls them but they do not do all these things in unison. Herd animals do
not sit out the Sabbath."
What it is they're doing
"In conclusion, the reality is that the Jews are nomads with an insect-like
mentality. They do not hold any "rights" whatsoever to a "homeland" in the
Middle East or anywhere else for that matter. They are incredibly dangerous
and parasitical and must not be allowed to rule or practice their so-called
"religion". It is devil worship and conjures up untold misery on Humanity."
- - - begin quoted material - - -
TSR NOMADS OF THE DIASPORA
Posted By: RogueButterfly
Date: Thursday, 26-Oct-2000 12:25:59
The Slazon Report #102400
Nomads of the Diaspora
The "Holy Bible" is full of holes. The "Old Testament" is history rewritten
to glorify nomads, the most inferior people ever to roam the Earth. The only
things "new" about the New Testament are the ever new and fresh words and
actions attributed to those whom we have come to know, and love, as Jesus
and John the Baptist. I assure you, by their words and by their actions we
shall know Them. They were not, nor could they ever have been, nomads (aka
Jews).
The Old Testament is history rewritten by nomadic plagiarists in their
attempt to create a record to support their ridiculously outlandish claims
to titles such as: "The Chosen Ones" and land in the Middle East. The Old
Testament is filled with falsified historical records of basically real
events written to cast the "tribes of scribes"
themselves in the roles of heroes or victims, whichever suited their purpose
at the time. The only way they could accomplish this was to destroy, distort
or conceal all physical evidence of real history and attempt to prevent
Humanity from ever accessing the indelible "Akashic Record" which is the
authentic record of every action of every life on Earth. The nomadic fools
still think they can hide their activities by doing their evil deeds in
underground chambers. They are 'way wrong.
The Earth itself is a gigantic recording device and broadcasts through
spinning.
The following excerpt could well be called "Exhibit A" in building the
criminal case against the nomadic predators. It is taken from "The Outline
of History" by H.G. Wells. When reading it keep in mind that "nomads" are,
in fact, the Jews of the Diaspora, the first followers of the depraved
"lord[s]" of the Old Testament.
"Civilization is something more than the occasional seasonal growing of
wheat. It is the settlement of men upon an area continuously cultivated and
possessed, who live in buildings continuously inhabited with a common rule
and a common city or citadel. For a long time civilization may quite
possibly have developed in Mesopotamia without any relations with the
parallel beginnings in Egypt. The two settlements may have been quite
independent, arising separately out of the widely diffused Heliolithic
Neolithic culture. Or they may have had a common origin in the region of the
Mediterranean, the Red Sea, and southern Arabia.
"The first condition necessary to a real settling down of Neolithic men, as
distinguished from a mere temporary settlement among abundant food, was of
course a trustworthy all-the-year-round supply of water, fodder for the
animals, food for themselves, and building material for their homes. There
had to be everything they could need at any season, and no want that would
tempt them to wander further. [Sounds like a description of Paradise.--JJ]
This was a possible state of affairs, no doubt, in many European and Asiatic
valleys; and in many such valleys, as in the case of the Swiss lake
dwellings, men settled from a very early date indeed; but nowhere, of any
countries now known to us, were these favourable conditions found upon such
a scale, and nowhere did they hold good so surely year in and year out as in
Egypt and in the country between the upper waters of the Euphrates and
Tigris and the Persian Gulf. Here was a constant water supply under enduring
sunlight; trustworthy harvests year by year; in Mesopotamia wheat yielded,
says Herodotus, two hundredfold to the sower; Pliny says that it was cut
twice and afterwards yielded good fodder for sheep; there were abundant
palms and many sorts of fruits, and as for building material, in Egypt there
was clay and easily worked stone, and in Mesopotamia a clay that becomes a
brick in the sunshine. In such countries men would cease to wander and
settle down almost unawares; they would multiply and discover themselves
numerous and by their their numbers safe from any casual assailant. They
multiplied producing a denser human population than the earth had ever known
before; their houses became more substantial, wild beasts were exterminated
over great areas, the security of life increased so that ordinary men went
about in the towns and fields without without encumbering themselves with
weapons, and among themselves, at least, they became peaceful peoples. men
took root as man had never taken root before.
"But the fertile and more seasonal lands outside these favoured areas, in
the forests of Europe, the Arabian deserts, and the seasonal pastures of
Central Asia, there developed on the other hand a thinner, more active
population of peoples, the primitive nomadic peoples. In contrast with the
settled fold, the agriculturists, these nomads lived freely and dangerously.
They were in comparison lean and hungry men.
Their herding was still blended with hunting; they fought constantly for
their pastures against hostile families. The discoveries in the elaboration
of implements and the use of metals made by the settled peoples spread to
them and improved their weapons. They followed the settled folk from
Neolithic phase to Bronze phase. It is possible that in the case of iron,
the first users were nomadic. They become more warlike with better arms, and
more capable of rapid movements with the improvement of their transport. One
must not think of a nomadic stage as a predecessor of a settled stage in
human affairs. To begin with, man was a slow drifter, following food. Then
one sort of men began to settle down, and another sort became more
distinctly nomadic. The settled sort began to rely more and more upon grain
for food; the nomad began to make a greater use of milk for food. he bred
his cows for milk. The two ways of life specialized in opposite directions.
It was inevitable that nomad folk and the settled folk should clash, that
the nomads should seem hard barbarians to the settled peoples, and the
settled peoples soft and effeminate and very good plunder to the nomad
peoples. Along the fringes of the developing civilizations there must have
been a constant raiding and bickering between hardy nomadic tribes and
mountain tribes and the more numerous and less warlike peoples in the towns
and villages.
"For the most part this was a mere raiding of the borders. The settled folk
had the weight of numbers on their side; the herdsmen might raid and loot,
but they could not stay. That sort of mutual friction might go on for many
generations. But ever and again we find some leader or some tribe amidst the
disorder of free and independent nomads, powerful enough to force a sort of
unity upon its kindred tribes, and then woe betide the nearest civilization.
Down pour the united nomads on the unwarlike, unarmed plains, and there
ensues a war of conquest.
Instead of carrying off the booty, the conquerors settle down on the
conquered land, which becomes all booty for them; the villagers and townsmen
are reduced to servitude and tribute-paying, they become hewers of wood and
drawers of water, and the leaders of the nomads become kings and princes,
masters and aristocrats. They, too, settle down, they learn many of the arts
and refinements of the conquered, they cease to be lean and hungry, but for
may generations they retain traces of their old nomadic habits, they hunt
and indulge in open-air sports, they drive and race chariots, they regard
work, especially agricultural work, as the lot of an inferior race and
class.
"This in a thousand variations has been one of the main stories in history
for the last seventy centuries or more. In the first history that we can
clearly decipher we find already in all the civilized regions a distinction
between a non-working ruler class and the working mass of the population.
And we find, too, that after some generations, the aristocrat, having
settled down, begins to respect the arts and refinements and lawabidiness of
settlement, and to lose something of his original hardihood. he
intermarries, he patches up a sort of toleration between conqueror and
conquered; he exchanges religious ideas and learns the lessons upon which
soil and climate insist. He becomes a part of the civilization he has
captured. And as he does so, events gather towards a fresh invasion by the
free adventurers of the outer world." (pp. 131-135) --H.G. Wells "The
Outline of History" (Garden City Publishing Co., Inc. 1930)
The nomads have done this to all peaceful and civilized nations.
Please understand what we have lost because of them. You have only to look
around at the world today, with your eyes open, and your thoughts free to
see it. The nomads are responsible for every evil act ever committed in the
world from the beginning right up to this minute.
They have done to others what they do not want done to them. They have
stolen every single God-Given Gift and used it to do evil. They have taken
our Divine Inheritance, corrupted it and sold it back to us for a profit.
They did this in Egypt during Joseph's time and continue to do it today.
They have been difficult to trace historically because, once they invade a
civilization and conqueror it, they assume the identity of those they have
conquered. This has puzzled many anthropologists, archeologists and ancient
historians. Throughout the ancient world they have found archeological
evidence that a completely separate group of people suddenly appears to
reside side by side in the dwellings of the original inhabitants. After an
unspecified period of time the original inhabitants vanish without a trace
except for their bones. An examination of the bones in those areas have
revealed signs of pot polishing and cut marks, both indicative of the
presence and practice of cannibalism. The nomads have a voracious appetite
for unblemished Human flesh. Their "lord" demands this. Their priests must
supply this. They are dangerous predators who dine their way through entire
civilizations. The English language fails when it comes to describing the
extent of their cruelty. It is necessary to call on mathematics and the
"Power of Tens". Cruelty to the 10th power. Theft to the 100th power.
Viciousness to the 1000th power. Evil to the 1,000,000th power.
Long ago they entered Paradise and raped and tortured and looted it.
They decided that they liked it there so they stayed, taking on the identity
and the history of the Paradisical population. A few of their victims
managed to escape. The nomads didn't worry much about them.
They figured they would find them when the time came. After all, they were
hunters, and hunters hunt. Eventually, after laying waste to Paradise and
assuming the characteristics of those whom they had so wantonly devoured,
the greedy and gluttonous nomads moved on. Since their Human herds had
become dangerously depleted, it was time to hunt again, only now they were
armed with the stolen idea of being "special" and "created by God".
The nomads themselves are not herd animals, they are hive animals,
completely lacking in individuality and spontaneity. They share one mind
between them, insect-like, and all their characteristics, habits and modes
of behavior are ritualized. A herd, on the other hand, is made up of
individuals, each capable of independent action, unless frightened into a
stampede. I have watched herds of cattle. They eat, they rest, they
socialize, they wander, they tend their young, they also come when the bull
calls them but they do not do all these things in unison. Herd animals do
not sit out the Sabbath.
Once, on a camping trip, I witnessed a young heifer who refused to come when
the bull called her. She was too interested in my campsite.
The bull came closer and called her firmly. She was torn. I could see this.
She looked at me. She looked longingly at my tent and things and hesitated.
The bull snorted and called her even louder. Reluctantly she obeyed and
started walking slowly towards him glancing back at the tent and me. When
the bull was satisfied that she was coming he turned and headed up the hill,
confident it seemed, that she would follow.
She did, but slowly. When she was gone I realized that I loved her! I stood
there utterly amazed by the depth of feeling I had for her. I missed her
fiercely within minutes of her leaving. I actually felt the urge to follow
her and I had a brief vision of joining her and the herd myself. I wondered
if the bull would accept me. That incident had a profound effect on me. It
was the first time I realized that I did not know WHAT a cow REALLY was.
From that I realized that I did not know what anything REALLY was. I had
been living in a world of labels, without questioning them. It began to dawn
on me that no one really knew anything about anything. We were living in a
gigantic mystery and yet some of the most evil, shallow people have had the
audacity to place themselves as obstacles in the path of knowledge. Such are
the ways of the nomads.
Matthew 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye
shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in
[yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
In conclusion, the reality is that the Jews are nomads with an insect-like
mentality. They do not hold any "rights" whatsoever to a "homeland" in the
Middle East or anywhere else for that matter. They are incredibly dangerous
and parasitical and must not be allowed to rule or practice their so-called
"religion". It is devil worship and conjurers up untold misery on Humanity.
We must bell them as we would bell a cat in order to protect those we love.
Identifying them and exposing them for what they are is also a kindness to
them, preventing them from committing further crimes against Humanity. Their
guilt is enormous. They have proven themselves incapable of resisting the
influence of evil. Compassion dictates that we must help them since most of
them have been taken in their infancy. We must consider them "possessed".
"[This] in a thousand variations has been one of the main stories in history
for the last seventy centuries or more."
--Ibid.
Yes, I know them oh so well. They cannot hide who and what they are from me.
I am The Witness to all their dirty deeds from The Alpha to The Omega. It's
Omega time now.
Jana Janus
Omnipresent on The Mean Planet
--
-- Tsun
"Don't tread on me."
Fredrick Töben looks at a MUST READ BOOK!
Fredrick Töben looks at a MUST READ BOOK!
A REVIEW OF Tomislav Sunic’s
Postmortem Report: Cultural Examinations from Postmodernity
Wermod & Wermod, PO Box 1107, Shamley Green GU50WJ, United Kingdom
ISBN 978-0-9561835-2-1
It is always refreshing to have a theoretical overlay perspective on matters that concern us, something British Empiricism has little time for but which is a matter of course within the French Rationalist and German Idealist tradition. Dr Thomislav Sunic does just that in his latest book. While empirical observations progress within a framework that permits cant and dissembling to take place, the other intellectual traditions demand a rationale and thereby activate the British Common Law principle of natural justice, i.e. it gives an individual the right of reply and so opens up a matter for discussion. For example, it should be known that the National Socialists aimed to raise living standards, lifting individuals into cultural endeavours that enabled them to appreciate the beauties of their heritage, their western culture. This is in marked contrast to the Communist-egalitarian endeavours that still seek to reduce individuals to the lowest common denominator – now so visible in the consumer society where uplifting world views crash into an abyss of infantile hedonism sublimated by a shroud of nihilism. The individual has the freedom to self-destruct but must not ask fundamental questions about life’s purpose, etc.
Professor Sunic’s 203-page book divides into five parts:
I: Religion;
II: Cultural Pessimism;
III: Race/The Third Reich;
IV: Liberalism and Democracy;
V: Multiculturalism and Communism.
Endnotes and a comprehensive Index conclude Sunic’s reflections, which shed more light on the vexed problem, for example, of the ugliness of modern art foisted upon an unsuspecting public that is beginning to smell a rat – celebrating ugliness is not a moral virtue! Now, instead of my review of Dr Sunic’s book here is Professor Kevin MacDonald’s excellent FOREWORD wherein all matters of importance are considered.
_________________
Foreword
This collection of articles and essays, previously published in a variety of journals and delving into topics ranging from race to literary criticism to philosophy of history, is most welcomed. Tom Sunic is an important intellectual – all the more so because there are so few intellectuals, especially in Europe, who are willing to dissent from the standard views of the left that have dominated intellectual discourse on issues relating to race, multiculturalism, and World War Two.
There are several qualities of his writing and his personal talent that I think are noteworthy. As an American, I greatly appreciate his European view of things. Every time I read one of his essays, I am introduced to a large number of authors who are unfamiliar to American audiences. Like most Americans, one of my (several) vices is that I am restricted to the English language. Sunic has read widely in French and German, and Croatian. This is a huge advantage in developing a broad perspective on European history and culture as a whole. So many intellectuals are confined to one little area- I think because they are afraid to be criticized by resident experts if they cross-disciplinary boundaries. The towering egos of so many intellectuals and their desires to defend their little territory against interlopers are huge barriers to progress.
Add to that his personal experience: The vast majority of Americans, myself included, have no experience of anything remotely resembling the brutal history of Europe’s recent past. Sunic grew up in Croatia under Communism and is personally acquainted with some of the darkest phenomena of the twentieth century. His family was persecuted by the communists and he clearly has a deep sense of the tragic aftermath of World War Two when the communist slaughtered many thousands of Croat nationals as well as nationals in other eastern European countries that came under communist domination. He discusses “the Aristocide of Bleiberg and other communist killing fields” – the point being that the communists murdered a considerable percentage of the Croatian elite. Indeed, he proposes that the murderous action of the communists probably had a dysgenic effect on the population as a whole.
As he points out, this murderous hostility toward the intelligent, the talented, and the physically gifted is the common denominator of the political left. Armed with theories of radical environmentalism (“the thesis that the social-economic environment engenders miracles) – what some have called “left creationism” and impervious to scientific fact and logic, communism has had a devastating effect wherever it has come to power.
Sunic is what has been called a “race realist” – someone who is not reticent in discussing the importance of race in human affairs based on scientific evidence and common sense. From ancient times, people have understood the importance of good breeding, and their perceptions of physical beauty and health have been adaptive in an evolutionary sense. The misshapen faces of gargoyles on the one hand and the ideal of the human form in much of western art tell a story of normal, healthy attitudes for much of our history. And it says much that the triumph of the left in world War two resulted also in the triumph of the abstractions and downright ugliness of modern art. This is art that ahs become established as high culture not because it naturally pleases the eye but because it pleases a corrupt, hostile, hyper-intellectualized, ethnically alien and politically motivated cultural establishment.
As Sunic reminds us, the defeat of National Socialism had devastating effect on the culture of the West – transforming it into a culture of suicide. In one of his most interesting essays, he shows that the art in Germany during the National Socialist period had strong classical themes. Whatever its faults – and there were many – the record shows that one strand of National Socialism was to preserve the traditional culture of Europe.
With historical hindsight, it is not too much to suggest that, unless there is a change in direction, the destruction of National Socialism represents the death knell of the West. This is because the culture of the post-World War Two West idolized White people with no allegiance to their people or their traditional culture, with no understanding of their own history. The books were burned and whatever was left of the old culture was anathematized.
Sunic writes that “the whole purpose of classicism and neo-classicisms, particularly in plastic art, but also in philosophy and literature suggested that Europeans had to abide by the cosmic rules of racial form and order. Whatever and whoever departs from order – brings in decadence and death”. The obvious implication is that to abandon this aesthetic is to accept death. The culture of the West has become the culture of Western suicide, and indeed there can be little doubt that that is exactly where we are headed.
Sunic goes where the very few post-World War Two intellectuals dared to tread: The idea that people of other racial backgrounds look up to Whites and behave accordingly. There is an envy and desire to mimic Whites: “The Western heritage, regardless of whether it is despised or loved by non-Europeans, is viewed either consciously or subconsciously as the ideal type and role model for all.”
This envy is also an aspect of the peril of European peoples. The ideology of the victors of World War Two has placed Europeans in a situation where their official ideology has as its central feature the moral imperative of cultural and demographic suicide. The racial resentment against the Western “other” that has often resulted in mimicry and emulation can also lead to violent retribution when the balance of power has shifted. Whites who fail to see all the signs of festering hostility of non-Whites who have been welcomed into Western countries under the aegis of wildly optimistic ideologies promulgated by hostile elites are simply not paying attention. It has a festering hostility of a large, deeply aggrieved Jewish population in the Soviet Union that led to the darkest horrors of the Twentieth Century.
Sunic understands the importance of race, but he does not think of the White race as a genetically homogenous group. Far from it. He rightly empathizes that central Europe has been a melting pot of different racial subgroups. Sunic points out that even during the Third Reich, the Germans did not think of themselves as a pure Nordic race but as a mixture of European racial sub-types. They recruited many different racial sub-types into high positions in the military, including a great many Slavs. As Sunic notes, the result was that the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS did not represent a very narrow racial type but included a great many Slavs and other people. The result was what he calls a “united European” fighting force. This departs quite radically from the received wisdom, and should have a major effect on how we think about World War Two.
Sunic also brings up things about World War Two that most of us are somewhat aware of but which are painful to read about. The psychopathic slaughters of civilians perpetrated on Dresden and other cities at a time when the outcome of the war had been decided are a monument of the viciousness of the Allies. The same can be said about the brutal treatment of German soldiers and civilians after the war, at least some of which was the result of Jewish influence. Indeed, it is apparent that if powerful Jews like Henry Morgenthau, Jun. (Secretary of the Treasury in the Roosevelt Administration) had had their way, many millions more Germans would have been murdered.
Sunic is one of those rare Western intellectuals who is willing to discuss Jewish influence openly and honestly. The real winners of World War two were not the Allies, including even the Soviet Union whose domination over Eastern Europe ultimately lasted less than 50 years. The real winners were the Jews.
Jewish power increased dramatically after World War Two. Israel was established in 1948 over the strong objections of the non-Jewish foreign policy establishment of the United States. Israel is now a regional power that is using its military capability and alliances with the United States to increase its territory.
After World War Two, anti-Jewish attitudes declined rapidly inn the United States and the West. There was a corresponding upsurge of Jewish wealth, political power, and cultural influence in the media, the arts, and the academic world. And a major facet of Jewish cultural power is that even by the 1940s Jewish influence became a taboo topic for anyone wishing to avoid social ostracism and penury.
Sunic presents a rational unbiased assessment of Jewish influence that is refreshingly free of the usual inhibitions without resorting to wild accusations and unverifiable assertions. In other words, Jewish influence should be discussed in a dispassionate manner of a social scientist just as it is with every other identifiable group. As Sunic points out, the only people who are allowed to discuss Jewish influence at all in the mainstream media are Jews. On the other hand, many Jews have achieved a great deal of influence as historians and critics of Western culture. The implicit attitude seems to be that Jewish history and Jewish influence are topics to be discussed, if at all, only within the Jewish community. It is a dialogue among Jews that non-Jews have no part in.
This is an inherently unfair situation, which has always had a tendency to lead to paranoia among non-Jews.
Europeans who have any allegiance to their people and the culture cannot stand by and accept this state of affairs. We are approaching an endgame situation in the West. In the United States, people of non-European descent will be the majority in just a few short decades, and the same will happen throughout Europe and other societies established by Europeans since the dawn of the Age of Discovery. At that point, centuries-old hostilities and resentments of non-white peoples towards Whites that Sunic discusses will come to the fore, and the culture and Europe will be irretrievably lost.
We must confront this impending disaster with a sense of psychological intensity and desperation. Reading Tom Sunic‘s essays will certainly provide the background for understanding how we got here and perhaps also for finding our way towards the future.
Professor Kevin MacDonald
Long Beach, California,
September 23, 2009.
A REVIEW OF Tomislav Sunic’s
Postmortem Report: Cultural Examinations from Postmodernity
Wermod & Wermod, PO Box 1107, Shamley Green GU50WJ, United Kingdom
ISBN 978-0-9561835-2-1
It is always refreshing to have a theoretical overlay perspective on matters that concern us, something British Empiricism has little time for but which is a matter of course within the French Rationalist and German Idealist tradition. Dr Thomislav Sunic does just that in his latest book. While empirical observations progress within a framework that permits cant and dissembling to take place, the other intellectual traditions demand a rationale and thereby activate the British Common Law principle of natural justice, i.e. it gives an individual the right of reply and so opens up a matter for discussion. For example, it should be known that the National Socialists aimed to raise living standards, lifting individuals into cultural endeavours that enabled them to appreciate the beauties of their heritage, their western culture. This is in marked contrast to the Communist-egalitarian endeavours that still seek to reduce individuals to the lowest common denominator – now so visible in the consumer society where uplifting world views crash into an abyss of infantile hedonism sublimated by a shroud of nihilism. The individual has the freedom to self-destruct but must not ask fundamental questions about life’s purpose, etc.
Professor Sunic’s 203-page book divides into five parts:
I: Religion;
II: Cultural Pessimism;
III: Race/The Third Reich;
IV: Liberalism and Democracy;
V: Multiculturalism and Communism.
Endnotes and a comprehensive Index conclude Sunic’s reflections, which shed more light on the vexed problem, for example, of the ugliness of modern art foisted upon an unsuspecting public that is beginning to smell a rat – celebrating ugliness is not a moral virtue! Now, instead of my review of Dr Sunic’s book here is Professor Kevin MacDonald’s excellent FOREWORD wherein all matters of importance are considered.
_________________
Foreword
This collection of articles and essays, previously published in a variety of journals and delving into topics ranging from race to literary criticism to philosophy of history, is most welcomed. Tom Sunic is an important intellectual – all the more so because there are so few intellectuals, especially in Europe, who are willing to dissent from the standard views of the left that have dominated intellectual discourse on issues relating to race, multiculturalism, and World War Two.
There are several qualities of his writing and his personal talent that I think are noteworthy. As an American, I greatly appreciate his European view of things. Every time I read one of his essays, I am introduced to a large number of authors who are unfamiliar to American audiences. Like most Americans, one of my (several) vices is that I am restricted to the English language. Sunic has read widely in French and German, and Croatian. This is a huge advantage in developing a broad perspective on European history and culture as a whole. So many intellectuals are confined to one little area- I think because they are afraid to be criticized by resident experts if they cross-disciplinary boundaries. The towering egos of so many intellectuals and their desires to defend their little territory against interlopers are huge barriers to progress.
Add to that his personal experience: The vast majority of Americans, myself included, have no experience of anything remotely resembling the brutal history of Europe’s recent past. Sunic grew up in Croatia under Communism and is personally acquainted with some of the darkest phenomena of the twentieth century. His family was persecuted by the communists and he clearly has a deep sense of the tragic aftermath of World War Two when the communist slaughtered many thousands of Croat nationals as well as nationals in other eastern European countries that came under communist domination. He discusses “the Aristocide of Bleiberg and other communist killing fields” – the point being that the communists murdered a considerable percentage of the Croatian elite. Indeed, he proposes that the murderous action of the communists probably had a dysgenic effect on the population as a whole.
As he points out, this murderous hostility toward the intelligent, the talented, and the physically gifted is the common denominator of the political left. Armed with theories of radical environmentalism (“the thesis that the social-economic environment engenders miracles) – what some have called “left creationism” and impervious to scientific fact and logic, communism has had a devastating effect wherever it has come to power.
Sunic is what has been called a “race realist” – someone who is not reticent in discussing the importance of race in human affairs based on scientific evidence and common sense. From ancient times, people have understood the importance of good breeding, and their perceptions of physical beauty and health have been adaptive in an evolutionary sense. The misshapen faces of gargoyles on the one hand and the ideal of the human form in much of western art tell a story of normal, healthy attitudes for much of our history. And it says much that the triumph of the left in world War two resulted also in the triumph of the abstractions and downright ugliness of modern art. This is art that ahs become established as high culture not because it naturally pleases the eye but because it pleases a corrupt, hostile, hyper-intellectualized, ethnically alien and politically motivated cultural establishment.
As Sunic reminds us, the defeat of National Socialism had devastating effect on the culture of the West – transforming it into a culture of suicide. In one of his most interesting essays, he shows that the art in Germany during the National Socialist period had strong classical themes. Whatever its faults – and there were many – the record shows that one strand of National Socialism was to preserve the traditional culture of Europe.
With historical hindsight, it is not too much to suggest that, unless there is a change in direction, the destruction of National Socialism represents the death knell of the West. This is because the culture of the post-World War Two West idolized White people with no allegiance to their people or their traditional culture, with no understanding of their own history. The books were burned and whatever was left of the old culture was anathematized.
Sunic writes that “the whole purpose of classicism and neo-classicisms, particularly in plastic art, but also in philosophy and literature suggested that Europeans had to abide by the cosmic rules of racial form and order. Whatever and whoever departs from order – brings in decadence and death”. The obvious implication is that to abandon this aesthetic is to accept death. The culture of the West has become the culture of Western suicide, and indeed there can be little doubt that that is exactly where we are headed.
Sunic goes where the very few post-World War Two intellectuals dared to tread: The idea that people of other racial backgrounds look up to Whites and behave accordingly. There is an envy and desire to mimic Whites: “The Western heritage, regardless of whether it is despised or loved by non-Europeans, is viewed either consciously or subconsciously as the ideal type and role model for all.”
This envy is also an aspect of the peril of European peoples. The ideology of the victors of World War Two has placed Europeans in a situation where their official ideology has as its central feature the moral imperative of cultural and demographic suicide. The racial resentment against the Western “other” that has often resulted in mimicry and emulation can also lead to violent retribution when the balance of power has shifted. Whites who fail to see all the signs of festering hostility of non-Whites who have been welcomed into Western countries under the aegis of wildly optimistic ideologies promulgated by hostile elites are simply not paying attention. It has a festering hostility of a large, deeply aggrieved Jewish population in the Soviet Union that led to the darkest horrors of the Twentieth Century.
Sunic understands the importance of race, but he does not think of the White race as a genetically homogenous group. Far from it. He rightly empathizes that central Europe has been a melting pot of different racial subgroups. Sunic points out that even during the Third Reich, the Germans did not think of themselves as a pure Nordic race but as a mixture of European racial sub-types. They recruited many different racial sub-types into high positions in the military, including a great many Slavs. As Sunic notes, the result was that the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS did not represent a very narrow racial type but included a great many Slavs and other people. The result was what he calls a “united European” fighting force. This departs quite radically from the received wisdom, and should have a major effect on how we think about World War Two.
Sunic also brings up things about World War Two that most of us are somewhat aware of but which are painful to read about. The psychopathic slaughters of civilians perpetrated on Dresden and other cities at a time when the outcome of the war had been decided are a monument of the viciousness of the Allies. The same can be said about the brutal treatment of German soldiers and civilians after the war, at least some of which was the result of Jewish influence. Indeed, it is apparent that if powerful Jews like Henry Morgenthau, Jun. (Secretary of the Treasury in the Roosevelt Administration) had had their way, many millions more Germans would have been murdered.
Sunic is one of those rare Western intellectuals who is willing to discuss Jewish influence openly and honestly. The real winners of World War two were not the Allies, including even the Soviet Union whose domination over Eastern Europe ultimately lasted less than 50 years. The real winners were the Jews.
Jewish power increased dramatically after World War Two. Israel was established in 1948 over the strong objections of the non-Jewish foreign policy establishment of the United States. Israel is now a regional power that is using its military capability and alliances with the United States to increase its territory.
After World War Two, anti-Jewish attitudes declined rapidly inn the United States and the West. There was a corresponding upsurge of Jewish wealth, political power, and cultural influence in the media, the arts, and the academic world. And a major facet of Jewish cultural power is that even by the 1940s Jewish influence became a taboo topic for anyone wishing to avoid social ostracism and penury.
Sunic presents a rational unbiased assessment of Jewish influence that is refreshingly free of the usual inhibitions without resorting to wild accusations and unverifiable assertions. In other words, Jewish influence should be discussed in a dispassionate manner of a social scientist just as it is with every other identifiable group. As Sunic points out, the only people who are allowed to discuss Jewish influence at all in the mainstream media are Jews. On the other hand, many Jews have achieved a great deal of influence as historians and critics of Western culture. The implicit attitude seems to be that Jewish history and Jewish influence are topics to be discussed, if at all, only within the Jewish community. It is a dialogue among Jews that non-Jews have no part in.
This is an inherently unfair situation, which has always had a tendency to lead to paranoia among non-Jews.
Europeans who have any allegiance to their people and the culture cannot stand by and accept this state of affairs. We are approaching an endgame situation in the West. In the United States, people of non-European descent will be the majority in just a few short decades, and the same will happen throughout Europe and other societies established by Europeans since the dawn of the Age of Discovery. At that point, centuries-old hostilities and resentments of non-white peoples towards Whites that Sunic discusses will come to the fore, and the culture and Europe will be irretrievably lost.
We must confront this impending disaster with a sense of psychological intensity and desperation. Reading Tom Sunic‘s essays will certainly provide the background for understanding how we got here and perhaps also for finding our way towards the future.
Professor Kevin MacDonald
Long Beach, California,
September 23, 2009.
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, White man. It tolls for thee.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298512006681060.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
The Bell Tolls
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, White man. It tolls for thee.
The Wall Street Journal reports: "Whites are on the verge of becoming a minority among newborn children in the U.S., marking a demographic shift that is already reshaping the nation's politics and economy. The Census reported Thursday that nonwhite minorities accounted for 48.6% of the children born in the U.S. between July 2008 and July 2009, gaining ground from 46.8% two years earlier. The trajectory suggests that minority births will soon eclipse births of whites of European ancestry. 'The question is just when,' said Kenneth Johnson, senior demographer at the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire. He guesses the demographic milestone will be crossed in the next few years, and could happen as early as 2011.
"America's changing face has transformed race relations from the traditional divide of black and white to a more complex mix of race, language and religion." (Read absolute chaos) "There are new strains on schools and social services, (Read financially unsustainable) while immigration has emerged as one of the nation's most contentious issues—as evidenced by Arizona's recent law that makes illegal immigration a state crime."
A number of forces are pushing the U.S. toward a "majority minority" future. The median age of the white population is older than that of nonwhites, and thus a larger share of minority women are in prime child-bearing years." (Read racial extinction for Whites) "In addition, white women are having fewer children than nonwhites, (Read feminism) while the growth in mixed marriages has led to more multiracial births." (Read genocide)
I'm not going to continue direct quotation. It's sickening. We all know that it's true, and we all know that we are doing nothing about it because we are so weak and lame and our character is so poor. We lack what used to be called “moral fiber.”
What kind of living organism will not fight for life when faced with extinction? The survival instinct seems to be ingrained in every kind of life we know, even plants, and yet not in the White race.
One has to presume that at some point the very, very rich will finally realize that our racial extinction is not a good idea, for without White people there will be no one to keep the infrastructure working and no big burly policemen to protect their pale billionaire asses from the mobs of non-Whites who will hunt them down and eat them when the Soylent Green runs out. And what will they do then? Probably try to flee to some kind of fortified Green Zone.
But how long will that last? And where will the Jew be in all this? Probably riding on the backs of the last goyim and hiding with them in their underground bunkers or wherever the last few wealthy Whites go to ground, and all around them the world reverts to the Pleistocene Age.
http://www.northwestfront.org
http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com
http://www.northwestfront.net
http://www.northwestrepublic.com
http://www.nwfront.net
"We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth. For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it."
-Patrick Henry
March 23, 1775
The Bell Tolls
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, White man. It tolls for thee.
The Wall Street Journal reports: "Whites are on the verge of becoming a minority among newborn children in the U.S., marking a demographic shift that is already reshaping the nation's politics and economy. The Census reported Thursday that nonwhite minorities accounted for 48.6% of the children born in the U.S. between July 2008 and July 2009, gaining ground from 46.8% two years earlier. The trajectory suggests that minority births will soon eclipse births of whites of European ancestry. 'The question is just when,' said Kenneth Johnson, senior demographer at the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire. He guesses the demographic milestone will be crossed in the next few years, and could happen as early as 2011.
"America's changing face has transformed race relations from the traditional divide of black and white to a more complex mix of race, language and religion." (Read absolute chaos) "There are new strains on schools and social services, (Read financially unsustainable) while immigration has emerged as one of the nation's most contentious issues—as evidenced by Arizona's recent law that makes illegal immigration a state crime."
A number of forces are pushing the U.S. toward a "majority minority" future. The median age of the white population is older than that of nonwhites, and thus a larger share of minority women are in prime child-bearing years." (Read racial extinction for Whites) "In addition, white women are having fewer children than nonwhites, (Read feminism) while the growth in mixed marriages has led to more multiracial births." (Read genocide)
I'm not going to continue direct quotation. It's sickening. We all know that it's true, and we all know that we are doing nothing about it because we are so weak and lame and our character is so poor. We lack what used to be called “moral fiber.”
What kind of living organism will not fight for life when faced with extinction? The survival instinct seems to be ingrained in every kind of life we know, even plants, and yet not in the White race.
One has to presume that at some point the very, very rich will finally realize that our racial extinction is not a good idea, for without White people there will be no one to keep the infrastructure working and no big burly policemen to protect their pale billionaire asses from the mobs of non-Whites who will hunt them down and eat them when the Soylent Green runs out. And what will they do then? Probably try to flee to some kind of fortified Green Zone.
But how long will that last? And where will the Jew be in all this? Probably riding on the backs of the last goyim and hiding with them in their underground bunkers or wherever the last few wealthy Whites go to ground, and all around them the world reverts to the Pleistocene Age.
http://www.northwestfront.org
http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com
http://www.northwestfront.net
http://www.northwestrepublic.com
http://www.nwfront.net
"We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth. For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it."
-Patrick Henry
March 23, 1775
Thursday, 10 June 2010
Kristallnacht in Perspective
Kristallnacht in Perspective
In November 1938 a Jew, Herschel Grynspan, shot a low level German diplomat in Paris, Ernst Vom Rath, killing him. Shortly thereafter a huge pogrom against Jews erupted in Germany called Kristallnacht, (or Crystal Night) . Synagogues and Jewish businesses were attacked, a huge amount of property damage was done and 91 Jews were killed.
The French authorities planned to put Grynspan on trial. The trial was forestalled by the German invasion of France the following year. Grynspan then turned himself in to the French authorities in Toulouse in Vichy occupied France. The Germans demanded his extradition to Germany; the French complied.
Grynspan supposedly acted alone in assassinating Vom Rath. But there are legitimate reasons for doubting it. Grynspan was poor and had no visible means of support. Yet Grynspan, a Polish Jew, was in contact in Paris with an organization, the LICRA, ("The League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism") before he shot Von Rath. After he shot Vom Rath, it was "The League" which provided his lawyer, Morro Giaferri, free of charge.
Did the LICRA, a known Zionist organization, hire Herschel Grynspan to assassinate Vom Rath? A German lady, Ingrid Weckert, argues this thesis very convincingly in her book, "Flashpoint". [Feuerzeichen in German]
To understand why the Zionists would hire a Jew to assassinate a German diplomat, one must understand the political alignments of the time. In November 1938 when the assassination took place, the British Empire, then in control of Palestine, was considering cutting off further Jewish immigration to the Holy Land. Such immigration was alienating the Arabs. In the spring/early summer of 1939 the British issued their famous White Paper proclaiming that no Jewish state would be created in Palestine and that no further Jewish immigration would be permitted after five years without Arab consent.
The Zionists in November 1938 knew what was coming. Their contacts within the British Government had alerted them. The Zionists needed a way to pressure HMG into allowing continued immigration.
Enter Herschel Grynspan and the LICRA. If the German government could be provoked into an anti-Semitic outrage through the premeditated murder of a German diplomat, then the resulting persecution in Germany could be used to keep immigration to Palestine open. "The Jews are being persecuted in Germany! How dare the British deny the Jews refuge in Palestine!" would be the battle cry. And, of course, Nazi persecution of the Jews had always been useful to the Zionists from day one of the Hitler regime. Jewish aliyah, or return to Palestine, had been in sharp decline during the 1920's, until Nazi persecution revived it.
Did the LICRA and international Zionism put Herschel Grynspan up to the murder? We will never know. As to Grynspan himself, his denouement in Germany is quite interesting. Originally the Nazis intended to put him on trial to prove that international Jewry had forced Germany into the war. However, there were problems. Von Rath had been a known homosexual. Grynspan's lawyer, Giaferri, had concocted a story that Grynspan and Vom Rath had been having an affair. Although this was false, to have the fact of Vom Rath's homosexuality brought out at trial would have been embarrassing. (Under French law, political assassination was a guillotine offense. If Giaferri could have demonstrated that Grynspan acted as a jilted lover, that might have spared him the guillotine.) Moreover, the German courts were not entirely convinced that they had the legal authority to try Grynspan. Grynspan was not a German citizen; he was a Polish Jew who had migrated to Germany on a passport and then moved to Paris. His crime had been committed on French, not German soil.
In the event, Herschel Grynspan was never put on trial. Some believe that he was eventually executed by the Germans in Sachsenhausen concentration camp according to the testimonies of certain inmates; others believe he survived the war under an assumed identity.
Whatever really happened to Herschel Grynspan, he was merely a pawn in a much bigger game. Whether Ingrid Weckert is right or not, Grynspan's foolish act served larger purposes.
Kristallnacht did not intimidate the British into reopening Palestine to Jewish immigration, even if that had been the hidden Zionist intent. The shot which killed Ernst Vom Rath was not the "shot heard round the world". It was, however, a shot which concealed much deeper political intrigues, intrigues whose parameters continue to the present day. Those intrigues are as little understood by the man-un-the-street now as they were then.
In November 1938 a Jew, Herschel Grynspan, shot a low level German diplomat in Paris, Ernst Vom Rath, killing him. Shortly thereafter a huge pogrom against Jews erupted in Germany called Kristallnacht, (or Crystal Night) . Synagogues and Jewish businesses were attacked, a huge amount of property damage was done and 91 Jews were killed.
The French authorities planned to put Grynspan on trial. The trial was forestalled by the German invasion of France the following year. Grynspan then turned himself in to the French authorities in Toulouse in Vichy occupied France. The Germans demanded his extradition to Germany; the French complied.
Grynspan supposedly acted alone in assassinating Vom Rath. But there are legitimate reasons for doubting it. Grynspan was poor and had no visible means of support. Yet Grynspan, a Polish Jew, was in contact in Paris with an organization, the LICRA, ("The League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism") before he shot Von Rath. After he shot Vom Rath, it was "The League" which provided his lawyer, Morro Giaferri, free of charge.
Did the LICRA, a known Zionist organization, hire Herschel Grynspan to assassinate Vom Rath? A German lady, Ingrid Weckert, argues this thesis very convincingly in her book, "Flashpoint". [Feuerzeichen in German]
To understand why the Zionists would hire a Jew to assassinate a German diplomat, one must understand the political alignments of the time. In November 1938 when the assassination took place, the British Empire, then in control of Palestine, was considering cutting off further Jewish immigration to the Holy Land. Such immigration was alienating the Arabs. In the spring/early summer of 1939 the British issued their famous White Paper proclaiming that no Jewish state would be created in Palestine and that no further Jewish immigration would be permitted after five years without Arab consent.
The Zionists in November 1938 knew what was coming. Their contacts within the British Government had alerted them. The Zionists needed a way to pressure HMG into allowing continued immigration.
Enter Herschel Grynspan and the LICRA. If the German government could be provoked into an anti-Semitic outrage through the premeditated murder of a German diplomat, then the resulting persecution in Germany could be used to keep immigration to Palestine open. "The Jews are being persecuted in Germany! How dare the British deny the Jews refuge in Palestine!" would be the battle cry. And, of course, Nazi persecution of the Jews had always been useful to the Zionists from day one of the Hitler regime. Jewish aliyah, or return to Palestine, had been in sharp decline during the 1920's, until Nazi persecution revived it.
Did the LICRA and international Zionism put Herschel Grynspan up to the murder? We will never know. As to Grynspan himself, his denouement in Germany is quite interesting. Originally the Nazis intended to put him on trial to prove that international Jewry had forced Germany into the war. However, there were problems. Von Rath had been a known homosexual. Grynspan's lawyer, Giaferri, had concocted a story that Grynspan and Vom Rath had been having an affair. Although this was false, to have the fact of Vom Rath's homosexuality brought out at trial would have been embarrassing. (Under French law, political assassination was a guillotine offense. If Giaferri could have demonstrated that Grynspan acted as a jilted lover, that might have spared him the guillotine.) Moreover, the German courts were not entirely convinced that they had the legal authority to try Grynspan. Grynspan was not a German citizen; he was a Polish Jew who had migrated to Germany on a passport and then moved to Paris. His crime had been committed on French, not German soil.
In the event, Herschel Grynspan was never put on trial. Some believe that he was eventually executed by the Germans in Sachsenhausen concentration camp according to the testimonies of certain inmates; others believe he survived the war under an assumed identity.
Whatever really happened to Herschel Grynspan, he was merely a pawn in a much bigger game. Whether Ingrid Weckert is right or not, Grynspan's foolish act served larger purposes.
Kristallnacht did not intimidate the British into reopening Palestine to Jewish immigration, even if that had been the hidden Zionist intent. The shot which killed Ernst Vom Rath was not the "shot heard round the world". It was, however, a shot which concealed much deeper political intrigues, intrigues whose parameters continue to the present day. Those intrigues are as little understood by the man-un-the-street now as they were then.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)